<span> C.The results of the Michelson-Morley experiment did not fit the theory of the luminiferous ether, so the theory had to be rejected. </span>
Answer: option D. the ability of a base to react with a soluble metal salt.
Justification:
NaOH is a strong base, which means that in water it will dissociate according to this reaction:
- NaOH(aq) → Na⁺ (aq) + OH⁻ (aq)
On the other hand, CuSO₄ is a soluble ionic salt which in water will dissociate into its ions according to this other reaction:
Hence, in solution, the sodium ion (Na⁺) will react with the metal salt in a double replacement reaction, where the highly reactive sodium ion (Na⁺) will substitute the Cu²⁺ in the CuSO₄ to form the sodium sulfate salt, Na₂SO₄ (water soluble), and the copper(II) hydroxide, Cu(OH)₂ (insoluble).
That is what the given reaction represents:
CuSO₄ (aq) + 2NaOH(aq) → Cu(OH)₂(s) + Na₂SO₄(aq)
↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
soluble metal salt strong base insoluble base solube salt
This one is beta decay (the -1 subscript tells us that)
Brad was suffering from HYPERthermia because his temp was 41°C which is equivalent to 106°F. His body temperature in kelvins is 314.15K
Answer:
NH3
Explanation:
2NH3(aq)+CO2(aq)→CH4N2O(aq)+H2O(l)
So for two moles of NH3 we need one mole of CO2. So let's count moles for each reagent.
n(NH3)=m(NH3)/M(NH3)=135700/17,03=7968.29 mol
n(CO2)=m(CO2)/M(CO2)=211400/44.01=4803.45 mol
From equation we have to divide n(NH3) by 2 because we need two equivalent per one CO2. That will be 3984.145. So the limiting agent is NH3 because it's not enough of it to react with all CO2
