It was 1.5 times the length of Noah's bike ride as Mai’s bike ride.
The problem we dealing with is related to mixed numbers which are referred to as mixed numbers and could be the whole number, and a proper division spoke together. It for the most part speaks to a number between any two whole numbers.
Since we are providing mai's rate which is 6 3/4 miles and Noah's rate of 4 1/2 miles, So in order to find the time the length of Noah's ride is compared to Mal's, we just need to divide the given rates by each other
=> 6 3/4 divided by 4 1/2,
=> 27/4 divided by 9/2, (The result is an improper fractions)
=> 27/4 X 2/9
=>3/2
=> 1.5
To know more about mixed numbers refer to the link brainly.com/question/24137171?referrer=searchResults.
#SPJ1
Solve the top equation for x and then substitute that into the bottom equation and solve for y:
Top equation: subtract 4 from both sides to get x = y - 4
Substitution and simplify:
y = 4(y - 4) - 10
y = 4y - 16 - 10
y = 4y - 26
-3y = -26
y = 26/3 or 8 1/3 or 8.333 (those are all the same but in different forms)
Answer:
-25
Step-by-step explanation:
Order of Operations
Answer:
D) y=-1/2x+4
Step-by-step explanation:
D) y=-1/2x+4
In order to be parallel, it has to have the same slope (-1/2). Also, if you plug in (-2,5) for x and y, it does pass through those coordinates.
Answer:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis so then we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.42
Step-by-step explanation:
Information given
n=1045 represent the random sample selected
X=502 represent the college graduates with a mentor
estimated proportion of college graduates with a mentor
is the value that we want to test
z would represent the statistic
represent the p value
Hypothesis to test
We want to test if the true proportion is higher than 0.42, the system of hypothesis are.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
The statistic is given by:
(1)
Replacing the info we got:
The p value for this case would be given by:
For this case the p value is lower than the significance level so then we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis so then we can conclude that the true proportion is significantly higher than 0.42
