It is c = 48b.
2 x 48 = 96
4 x 48 = 192
9 x 48 = 432
The only safe conclusion is that point G lies on line FH or that point G lies somewhere between line FH. We cannot conclude that point G is the midpoint of line FH eventhough by virtue of definition of midpoint, the given equation is a proof equation. If G were to be midpoint, segment FG must be equal to segment GH in line FH.
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>Answer :- </h3>
- Let the three consecutive numbers be x -2 , x and x + 2
- Their sum = ( x - 2 ) + ( x + 2 ) = 3x
- This is the given equal to 54
- 3x = 54 or x = 54/3
- x = 18
<em>Thus </em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>the </em><em>required </em><em>numbers </em><em>are </em><em>1</em><em>6</em><em> </em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>1</em><em>8</em><em> </em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>2</em><em>0</em><em> </em>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Here are the steps to follow when solving absolute value inequalities:
Isolate the absolute value expression on the left side of the inequality.
If the number on the other side of the inequality sign is negative, your equation either has no solution or all real numbers as solutions.
If your problem has a greater than sign (your problem now says that an absolute value is greater than a number), then set up an "or" compound inequality that looks like this:
(quantity inside absolute value) < -(number on other side)
OR
(quantity inside absolute value) > (number on other side)
The same setup is used for a ³ sign.
If your absolute value is less than a number, then set up a three-part compound inequality that looks like this:
-(number on other side) < (quantity inside absolute value) < (number on other side)
The same setup is used for a £ sign
