All categories

4 years ago

In which Colorado Rockies scenario was there more erosion? Why was there more erosion in the scenario?

2 answers:

7 0

There was more erosion in the Colorado Rockies scenario where there was steady rain compared to the scenario in the same area where there was only a drizzle. There is more erosion because the steady rain increased the volume of the river more than the drizzle did. Because there was more water added to the river, the river flowed faster. The faster a river flows, the more sediments it transports or erodes.

DENIUS [597]4 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Erosion in the Colorado Rookies Scenario that record a ready rain were more than the other scenario in the same area with just a drizzle. The Erosion is much in the Colorado Rockies Scenario that record a steady rain because the volume of the rivers has goes up compare to that of the Scenario with just a drizzle. As a result of the increased in the amount of the rivers bank that is flowing, the river flows more faster which helps in the transportation of the sediments or Erodes.

You might be interested in

Use the reaction N2(g) + 3H2(g) 2NH3(g) to answer the following questions

Veronika [31]

Answer:

][H

]

[NH

]

+3H

⇌2NH

(1.5×10

−2

)(3×10

−2

)

(1.2×10

−2

)

1.5×10

−2

×27×10

−6

1.44×10

−4

40.5×10

−4

1.44

=0.035×10

5 0

3 years ago

What is it called when the moon blocks the view from the sun?

defon

Answer:

solar eclipse

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A lever with a mechanical advantage greater then 1 is used to

love history [14]

<span>. increase distance , increase force.</span>

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

An aircraft is taking a group of skydivers up into the air. Evan is dressed in

Kisachek [45]

4,410 kJ

Explanation:

Gravitational Potential Enegry (GPE) is calculated as;

GPE = <em>m*g*h</em> where;

m = mass (kg)

g = gravity (m/s²)

h = height (meters)

= 90 * 9.8 * 5000

= 4,410,000‬ joules

= 4,410 kJ

4 0

3 years ago

Draw the structure with the molecular formula C6H14O that most likely produced the below IR and 1H NMR. The 13C NMR data is 78.3

spayn [35]

Answer:

The answer is 2,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol and the structure is attached below.

Explanation:

Although we are not provided with ¹H-NMR spectrum and IR spectrum but still we can elucidate the ¹³C-NMR data and finalize a plausible structure.

First of all we look at the molecular formula, we can conclude from the formula that the structure given is saturated in nature because the hydrogen deficiency index of this formula is zero. Hence, we can say that there is no double bond either between Carbon atoms or between carbon and oxygen atom. This can also be proved by the absence of peaks in downfield as unsaturated compounds and carbonyl compounds give value above 100 and 200 ppm respectively.

Secondly, we can also conclude that among the six carbon atom two pairs of them are having same electronic environment because we are having only 4 signals hence we can conclude that two pairs have same chemical shift values.

Also, after making every possinble isomer of given molecular formula the structure of 2,3-dimethylbutan-2-ol was found to be the most accurate structure.

8 0

3 years ago