An author argued that more basketball players have birthdates in the months immediately following July 31, because that was the
age cutoff date for nonschool basketball leagues. Here is a sample of frequency counts of months of birthdates of randomly selected professional basketball players starting with January: 390, 392, 360, 318, 344, 330, 322, 496, 486, 486, 381, 331 . Using a 0.05 significance level, is there sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that professional basketball players are born in different months with the same frequency? Do the sample values appear to support the author's claim?
1 answer:
Answer:
There is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that professional basketball players are born in different months with the same frequency.
Step-by-step explanation:
In this case we need to test whether there is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that professional basketball players are born in different months with the same frequency.
A Chi-square test for goodness of fit will be used in this case.
The hypothesis can be defined as:
<em>H₀</em>: The observed frequencies are same as the expected frequencies.
<em>Hₐ</em>: The observed frequencies are not same as the expected frequencies.
The test statistic is given as follows:
The values are computed in the table.
The test statistic value is .
The degrees of freedom of the test is:
n - 1 = 12 - 1 = 11
Compute the <em>p</em>-value of the test as follows:
p-value < 0.00001
*Use a Chi-square table.
p-value < 0.00001 < α = 0.05.
So, the null hypothesis will be rejected at any significance level.
Thus, there is sufficient evidence to warrant rejection of the claim that professional basketball players are born in different months with the same frequency.
You might be interested in
Answer:
The question is giving you pairs of points in space which can be used to define lines. It is then asking you to determine if the lines defined by those points are parallel, perpendicular, or neither.
Step-by-step explanation:
Two key things you need to know to solve this is that the lines will be parallel if their slopes are the same, and perpendicular if one slope is the negative reciprocal of the other (i.e. )
Let's start with question 11. You are given two pairs of points, each of which describes a distinct line:
(3,5)-(1,1) and (0, 2)-(5, 12)
To find the slope of each pair, take the vertex with the lesser x co-ordinate, and subtract it from the vertex with the greater x co-ordinate. That will give us a valid Δx and Δy to get the slope.
In the first pair, 3 > 1, so we'll subtract the second point from the first:
So the first pair of vectors describe a line with a slope of 2. Let's look at the other pair:
That also gives us a slope of 2, meaning that the two lines are parallel.
This same process will need to be done for the other three questions. We can't answer questions 12 or 14 here, as the last point is cut off on the edge of the image. For question 3 though, one line has a slope of 7/3, and the other 3/7. That puts them in the "neither" category, as one is not the negative reciprocal of the other, but instead the positive reciprocal.