Answer:
State your hypothesis as concisely, and to the point, as possible. A hypothesis is usually written in a form where it proposes that, if something is done, then something else will occur. Usually, you don't want to state a hypothesis as a question. You believe in something, and you're seeking to prove it.
Explanation:
Any electromagnetic wave, like light or heat.
I believe the answer is chemical reactivity because: Characteristics such as melting point, boiling point, density, solubility, color, odor, etc. are physical properties.
The reasoning which is in use when large, angular rocks are interpreted to have originated from the outcrop at the top of the hill is; Fossil succession
<h3>Fossil succession of rocks</h3>
The principle of fossil succession in characterized by the fact that fossil entities succeed one another upward through rock layers in a definite and determinable order.
On this note, any time period can be dated by its fossil content.
Read more on fossil succession;
brainly.com/question/2631497
Supposing the runner is condensed to a point and moves upward at 2.2 m/s.
It takes a time = 2.2/g = 2.2/9.8 = 0.22 seconds to increase to max height.
Now looking at this condition in opposite - that is the runner is at max height and drops back to earth in 0.22 s (symmetry of this kind of motion).
From what height does any object take 0.22 s to fall to earth (supposing there is no air friction)?
d = 1/2gt²= (0.5)(9.8)(0.22)²= 0.24 m
