Answer:


Since the p value is lower than the significance level given of 0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis on this case. And the best conclusion for this case is:
We (reject) the null hypothesis. That means that we (found) evidence to support the alternative.
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following info given:
represent the sampel mean for the age of customers
represent the population standard deviation
represent the sample size selected
We want to test if the mean age of her customers is over 35 so then the system of hypothesis for this case are:
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis 
The statistic for this case is given by:

And replacing the data given we got:

We can calculate the p value since we are conducting a right tailed test like this:

Since the p value is lower than the significance level given of 0.05 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis on this case. And the best conclusion for this case is:
We (reject) the null hypothesis. That means that we (found) evidence to support the alternative.
To find the x-intercept, substitute in 0 for y and solve for x. To find the y-intercept, substitute in 0 for x and solve for y.
x-intercept: (9/4,0)
y-intercept: (0,−9)
8z − 4 = 7z
move 8z to the other side
sign changes from +8z to -8z
8z-8z-4=7z-8z
-4= 7z-8z
-4= -z
mutiply both sides by -1 to get +z
(-4)(-1)= (-z)(-1)
Answer:
z= 4
Answer:
She still has to cut 1 3 /16
Step-by-step explanation:
Olivia wants to cut 3 3/4 inches from a piece of string. Converting 3 3/4 to improper fraction, it becomes 15/4 inches.
She already cut off 2 9/16 inches converting to improper fractions it becomes 41/16 inches.
15/4 - 41/16 = (60-41)/16 = 19/16 inches
19/16 = 1.187 ~ 1
19 - (16 x 1) =3