All categories

4 years ago

Modern psychologists have proposed the facial feedback hypothesis based on the theories of

Physics

2 answers:

aev [14]4 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Charles Darwin

Explanation:

The facial feedback hypothesis states that facial movement can influence emotional experience.

He suggested that physiological changes caused by an emotion had a direct impact on that emotions, rather than being just the consequence of that emotion. He wrote:

"The free expression by outward signs of an emotion intensifies it. On the other hand, the repression, as far as this is possible, of all outward signs softens our emotions... Even the simulation of an emotion tends to arouse it in our minds."

sveta [45]4 years ago

6 0

Charles Darwin was the first to state that physiological changes have an impact on the emotion emotion rather than just being a result of it. Therefore, modern facial feedback hypothesis is based on the theories of Charles Darwin.

You might be interested in

if there are infinite universes is it possible that there is a universe where 1+1=3 or 4 or something

zhenek [66]

Answer:

noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo i said nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose that you are swimming in a river while a friend watches from the shore. In calm water, you swim at a speed of 1.25 m/s .

aliya0001 [1]

Answer: The observing friend will the swimmer moving at a speed of 0.25 m/s.

Explanation:

Let <em>S</em> be the speed of the swimmer, given as 1.25 m/s

Let $S_{0}$ be the speed of the river's current given as 1.00 m/s.

Note that this speed is the magnitude of the velocity which is a vector quantity.

The direction of the swimmer is upstream.

Hence the resultant velocity is given as, $S_{R}$ = S — S 0 $S_{0}$

$S_{R}$ = 1.25 — 1

$S_{R}$ = 0.25 m/s.

Therefore, the observing friend will see the swimmer moving at a speed of 0.25 m/s due to resistance produced by the current of the river.

6 0

3 years ago

Atomic physicists usually ignore the effect of gravity within an atom. To see why, we may calculate and compare the magnitude of

STatiana [176]

Answer:

$2.27\cdot 10^{49}$

Explanation:

The gravitational force between the proton and the electron is given by

$F_G=G\frac{m_p m_e}{r^2}$

where

G is the gravitational constant

$m_p$ is the proton mass

$m_e$ is the electron mass

r = 3 m is the distance between the proton and the electron

Substituting numbers into the equation,

$F_G=(6.67259\cdot 10^{-11} m^3 kg s^{-2})\frac{(1.67262\cdot 10^{-27}kg) (9.10939\cdot 10^{-31}kg)}{(3 m)^2}=1.13\cdot 10^{-68}N$

The electrical force between the proton and the electron is given by

$F_E=k\frac{q_p q_e}{r^2}$

where

k is the Coulomb constant

$q_p = q_e = q$ is the elementary charge (charge of the proton and of the electron)

r = 3 m is the distance between the proton and the electron

Substituting numbers into the equation,

$F_E=(8.98755\cdot 10^9 Nm^2 C^{-2})\frac{(1.602\cdot 10^{-19}C)^2}{(3 m)^2}=2.56\cdot 10^{-19}N$

So, the ratio of the electrical force to the gravitational force is

$\frac{F_E}{F_G}=\frac{2.56\cdot 10^{-19} N}{1.13\cdot 10^{-68}N}=2.27\cdot 10^{49}$

So, we see that the electrical force is much larger than the gravitational force.

5 0

3 years ago

Is the acceleration change or constnt?

marin [14]

Change.

Acceleration means going faster

4 0

2 years ago

A 42 Watt light bulb is connected to a 12 volt source of potential

abruzzese [7]

Answer:

The natural medium emanating from the Sun and other very hot sources (now recognised as electromagnetic radiation with a wavelength of 400-750 nm), within which vision is possible.

Explanation:

just the way it is

8 0

4 years ago