Answer:
a.5years=300 rabbits
b. 50 years(multiply 50 by 300)
Step-by-step explanation:
hope this is helpful
Answer:
y=2x^2 + 2x - 3 x -2 -1 0 1 2
Step By Step Explanation:
The values can be find by plugging the x values in the equation which gives us the y value ,
x -2 -1 0 1 2
y 1 -3 -3 1 9
(b) Plot the points on the graph and join by a smooth curve.
(c) The line y=1 will be passing through 1 and parallel to x-axis.
(d) solve 2x^2 + 2x - 3 = 1
Subtract 1 from both the sides ,
2x^2 + 2x - 2 = 0
Factoring out the 2 from the equation ,
2(x^2 + x - 1) = 0
x^2 + x - 1 = 0
Apply the quadratic formula
x=(-1-sqrt(5))/2 and x = (-1+sqrt(5))/5
Answer:
She shouldn't tip at all since that's a ridiculous concept
Step-by-step explanation:
common sense
SORRY MADE A MISTAKE WITH THE CALCULATOR I KNEW I MESSED SOMETHING UP
The cost of the meal was $22 so that's the price plus tax and tax is 10% of the price so
cost = price + 0.1*price
cost = 1.1 * price
price = cost / 1.1
price = 22 / 1.1 = <u>20</u>
now we need 20% of that so that's
20 * 0.2 = <u>4</u>
If she's simple-minded enough to tip that would amount to <u>$4</u>
Answer:
544 cm²
Step-by-step explanation:
hello,
to find the tsa of a rectangular prism, you use:
tsa = 2 ( lw + lh + wh )
in this case, l = 16 cm, w = 6 cm and h = 8 cm.
knowing these informations, you can proceed with using the formula.
tsa = 2 [ ( 16*6) + ( 16*8 ) + ( 6*8) ]
= 2 [ 96 + 128 + 48 ]
= 2 ( 272 )
= 544 cm²
please try to understand how i worked this out, and do let me know if you have any questions.
have a great day! thank you!
Answer:
A. 560
Step-by-step explanation:
multiply 600 by 0.93 in order to find out what 93% of 600 is.
600 x 0.93 = 558
since 558 isn't one of the options you find which one is closest to it, then divide by 600 in order to see if it's still 93%
a) 560/ 600 = 0.93333 = 93.3%
there's your answer.
but to compare it with the rest of the answer choices:
b) 540 / 600 = 0.9 = 90%
c) 470 / 600 = 0.78333 = 78.3%
d) 490 / 600 = 0.81667 = 81.6%
none of these are in the range of 93, so they're incorrect