Answer:
B. Respiratory and Circulatory
I'm pretty sure
Explanation:
Answer:
Moles of NO₂ = 0.158
Explanation:
SO 2 ( g ) + NO 2 ( g ) ⇄ SO 3 ( g ) + NO ( g )
According to the law of mass equation
= ![\frac{[SO_{3} ][NO]}{[SO_{2}][NO_{2} ]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B%5BSO_%7B3%7D%20%5D%5BNO%5D%7D%7B%5BSO_%7B2%7D%5D%5BNO_%7B2%7D%20%20%5D%7D)
⇒ 3.10 =
At equilibrium [SO₃] = [NO]
⇒ [NO₂] = 
⇒ [NO₂] = 0.158
So. number of moles of NO₂ at equilibrium added = 0.158
Boyle's law p1V1=p2V2
p2=(p1V1)/V2
p2=(205*10^3 Pa * 4*10^-3 m^3 ) / (12*10^-3 m^3)
p2= 68333 Pa
You are left with a chloride ion, so you started off with a chlorine atom.
Cl + e- → Cl-
<h2>
Hello!</h2>
The answer is:
The empirical formula is the option B. 
<h2>
Why?</h2>
The empirical formula of a compound is the simplest formula that can be written. On the opposite, the molecular formula involves a variant of the same compound, but it can be also simplified to an empirical formula.

We are looking for a formula that cannot be simplified by dividing the number of molecules/atoms that conforms the compound.
Let's discard option by option in order to find which formula is an empirical formula (cannot be simplified)
A. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

B. 
It's an empirical formula since it cannot be obtained by the multiplication of a whole number and the simplest formula. It's the simplest formula that we can find of the compound.
C. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

D. 
It's not an empirical formula, it's a molecular formula since it can be obtained by multiplying the empirical formula of the same compound.

Hence, the empirical formula is the option B. 
Have a nice day!