Answer:A pair of sandals.
Explanation:Its so obvious stating that the marginal utility derived from sandals is higher compared to the other two items. You maximize your utility by going for the item with highest satisfaction which is glaringly sandals.
You also maximize your utility by considering the item which is economica prudent to one needs or want.
Answer:
<em>Provide clear statements</em>
<em>The government can pay for projects to create work</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is "The last choice"
Explanation:
While comparing 2 assets or portfolio management, the risk of each portfolio and the rates of return of each portfolio should be taken into consideration. Whether the same danger is in the two assets. One should be preferred with both the higher return and one from the lowest risk should be recommended unless the two have the same rate of return. Portfolio A consequently either has a higher return and an at least as low fluctuation as B, or even lower volatility as well as an anticipated return at least as strong as B.
Answer:
D. Only customers receive a financial institution privacy notice automatically
Explanation:
Let us take an illustration of all the points, primarily A is inaccurate because simply customers acquire a financial institution's privacy note directly. B and C are unreliable because, depending on the bank's privacy practices, both consumers and customers may have rights under the law and be able to opt-out. So, the answer will be D as we know that, the Privacy Rule demands thou to provide a note to each of your "customers" regarding your privacy systems.
A corn farmer is considered a free rider if he chooses not to join the national interest group his fellow farmers created, yet still reaps the benefits of the tax incentives the group lobbied for and won.
The free rider problem is an economic concept of a market failure that occurs when people or individuals are benefiting from resources, goods or services that they do not pay for. In our case, the corn farmer is benefiting from the tax incentives the group lobbied for, yet he or she made zero input or effort to contribute to the groups agenda in getting tax incentives. <span />