1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Daniel [21]
3 years ago
10

Imagine you live on the planet Krypton. The loanable funds market on Krypton is thriving and life is good. However, the planet i

s very, very old and the great scientists and philosophers on the planet have begun discussing openly that the planet may be on the verge of destruction. Even if the great thinkers are wrong, the loanable funds market will change in the short term. Specifically, the supply of loanable funds is expected to __________, and as a result the amount of economic output in the future is expected to __________
Business
1 answer:
sergij07 [2.7K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: fall; decrease

Explanation:

People save in order to be able to consume in future. If it is discovered that there will be no fixture, there would be no need to save. The supply of loanable funds would therefore decrease as people stopped saving.

Because there is reduced loanable funds, less investments would be done as these require loanable funds. With less investments being done, the economic output will decrease.

You might be interested in
Reasons for unequal distribution of income in developing countries​
Colt1911 [192]

Answer:

the answer is because it would never be equal

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Malcolm is a professional writer. He has already published many best-sellers. One of his friends expressed interest in knowing m
maxonik [38]

Answer:

Malcolm is a professional writer. He has already published many best-sellers. One of his friends expressed interest in knowing more about his writing process, so Malcolm showed his friend a few of his first drafts. The friend observed that the drafts were nothing like the final book, and the writing seemed amateurish compared to Malcolm's published work. When asked about it, Malcolm said that it was the normal way of things. In this scenario, the following is the reason of this:

A) ​Malcolm would have revised his work many times before he was satisfied with it.

Explanation:

  • The option A is best reason because generally a writer doesn't break his or her flow while writing and that is what Malcolm would have done. After, he would have revised his work many times until he was satisfied.
  • The option B is not correct as it is not possible to change the book of a writer entirely by the publishing company.
  • The option C is also incorrect as the drafts were not long and cohesive because his friend found the draft amateurish but not perfect.
  • The option D is incorrect as it is not true that writers only create first draft and other people produce all other subsequent drafts.

4 0
3 years ago
RuthAnn is 28 years old and is retiring at the age of 65. When she retires, she estimates that she will need an annual income of
inessss [21]

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

From her current age of 28 to her retirement age of 65, RuthAnn has (65 - 28 =) 37 more years to work.

If she saves 11% of her annual income of $36,278.13 into a 401(k), she will be setting aside (11% * 36,278.13 =) $3,990.59 into the 401(k) account annually.

At 7.1% compounding rate, in 37 years, RuthAnn would have set aside an amount estimated by the future value of an annuity formula.

FV = \frac{A(1+r)^{n} - 1}{r}

where FV is the future value, the amount that would have been set aside,

A = is the annual savings,

r = is the compounding rate, and

n = is the number of years.

Therefore, the total amount that would be saved up after 37 years =

FV = \frac{3,990.59(1+0.071)^{37} - 1}{0.071}

= (3,990.59 * 11.6535)/0.071

= $654,990.31.

By spending $32,523 annually from an account earning 7.1% compound interest rate for 30 years, the present value of the total amount needed by RuthAnn today that will be sufficient for her retirement spending can be estimated using the present value of an annuity formula.

PV = \frac{A(1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r}

= PV = \frac{32,523(1 - (1.071)^{-30}}{0.071}

= (32523 * 0.8723)/0.071

= $399,574.83.

Since the amount saved up ($654,990.31) is more than the total amount required for RuthAnn's retirement ($399,574.83), RuthAnn has more than sufficient to meet her Retirement goal.

Specifically, the amount she has saved up can support a maximum annual spending which can be estimated from the present value of an annuity formula.

PV = \frac{A(1 - (1+r)^{-n}}{r}

where PV = the amount saved up, $654,990.31,

A = the annual spending which we are estimating,

r = the 7.1% compound interest rate,

n = the number of years to retirement.

654,990.31 = \frac{A(1 - (1.071)^{-30}}{0.071}

= 654,990.31 = (A * 0.8723)/0.071

= A = 654,990.31/0.8723 * 0.071

= A = 53,312.29

Thus, the amount saved up can support a maximum retirement spending of $53,312.29, which is higher than the $32,523 annual income needed by RuthAnn for her retirement.

6 0
3 years ago
In 2018, CPS Company changed its method of valuing inventory from the FIFO method to the average cost method. At December 31, 20
MaRussiya [10]

Answer:

Dr Retained earnings $8.2

Cr Inventory $8.2

Explanation:

By changing method of an inventory valuation, the company should apply it retrospectively based on IAS 8 guidelines on change in accounting estimates and errors. Thus, the said difference from FIFO method to Weighted Average method of valuation should be credited directly against Retained earnings account because, accounts are already closed right after the year ended.

$32-$23.8= $8.2 million

To record the said adjustment you have to

Debit Retained earnings and credit Inventory in the amount of $8.2 million.

4 0
4 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a basic assumption of perfect​ competition? A. Production is characterized by significant economie
Alex17521 [72]

Answer: Production is characterized by significant economies of scale is not an assumption of perfect competition (A)

Explanation:

A perfect competition is a form of market structure that has many buyers and may sellers. In a perfect competition, there is a free entry and exit for producers as there is no barrier.

Also, firms are price takers as no producer can influence the price of the goods in the market unlike in an imperfect competition which is a price maker as producers can influence price. Firms also sell identical products that are the same in quality, size etc.

In a perfect competition, production is not characterized by significant economies of scale. That is an assumption that can be found in monopoly.

Therefore, option A is the right answer.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • ________ variables, from countries to neighborhoods, are the units that may be considered in developing a segmentation strategy.
    7·1 answer
  • Q 2.3: mason corporation purchased a piece of land 5 years ago when the price of land was low. it plans to develop the land into
    6·1 answer
  • As a financial advisor, what will you tell your client, Ryan, he should be willing to pay for an investment property that he pla
    7·1 answer
  • Over the last four years, a stock has had an arithmetic average return of 8.8 percent. Three of those four years produced return
    9·1 answer
  • Which is true of​ output-choice models of oligopoly​ behavior?
    12·1 answer
  • Will is preparing a report and he wants to make sure that his audience makes an informed decision. He wants to make sure that he
    15·1 answer
  • Tanouye Corporation keeps careful track of the time required to fill orders. Data concerning a particular order appear below: Ho
    8·1 answer
  • PLS HELP ASAP WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!!
    11·1 answer
  • Furniture purchase for cash in accounting equation​
    8·1 answer
  • Does a competitive firm’s price equal its marginal cost in the short run, in the long run, or both? explain.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!