The cost of developing thermonuclear power with plasmabe defended because D. It can provide an inexpensive power source.
<h3>How did the
cost of developing t
hermonuclear power defended?</h3>
The cost of developing thermonuclear power defended becvause we can see in the paragraph how it was told that the generation of ths power can be donee through the understanding of the occurrence of plasmain nature,
It should be noted that this thermonuclear power with plasmabe posses the characteristics which make it to exist in the ionosphere, and it can be felt in the flames as well; as in the chemical and nuclearexplosions.
In conclusion the power can be seen as an inexpensive source power because the p[roduction of this power cn be found in most of the thing that can be found around us as discused above.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Read more about cost at:
brainly.com/question/25109150
#SPJ1
Answer:
ReCrystallization
Contact pressure causing grains to "grow" together.
It's a metamorphic process used to rearrange the atoms of the minerals in order to modify them in to the required form under the specific temperature and pressure. For example conversion of limestone into marble.
<em>Cementation:</em>
Precipitation of bonding agents between grains.
Cementation is the process in which the minerals in the form of fluid fills in spaces between the grains and binds them together upon crystallizing.
<em>Compaction:</em>
Increase in density due to weight of overburden.
Compaction as it's name indicate is the compaction of the sediments due to the heavy weight of the rocks which reduce their size and increase their density.
Answer:
9.96 m/s
Explanation:
mass of car, m = 487 kg
radius of track, R = 53.3 m
coefficient of static friction, μ = 0.19
acceleration due to gravity, g = 9.8 m/s^2
let v be the maximum speed so that the car can go without flying off the track.
The formula for the maximum speed is given by
vmax = 9.96 m/s
