When the reaction equation is:
HF ↔ H+ + F-
and when the Ka expression
= concentration of products/concentration of reactions
so, Ka = [H+][F-]/[HF]
when we assume:
[H+] = [F-] = X
and [HF] = 0.35 - X
So, by substitution:
6.8 x 10^-4 = X^2 / (0.35 - X) by solving for X
∴ X = 0.015 M
∴[H+] = X = 0.015
when PH = -㏒[H+]
∴PH = -㏒0.015
= 1.8
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
56.11 g/mol
<h3>
General Formulas and Concepts:</h3>
<u>Math</u>
<u>Pre-Algebra</u>
Order of Operations: BPEMDAS
- Brackets
- Parenthesis
- Exponents
- Multiplication
- Division
- Addition
- Subtraction
<u>Chemistry</u>
<u>Atomic Structure</u>
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
<u>Step 1: Define</u>
[Compound] KOH
<u>Step 2: Identify</u>
[PT] Molar Mass of K - 39.10 g/mol
[PT] Molar Mass of O - 16.00 g/mol
[PT] Molar Mass of H - 1.01 g/mol
<u>Step 3: Find</u>
39.10 + 16.00 + 1.01 = 56.11 g/mol
Answer:
The direct channels by which extraction can affect the economy are of particular interest. The development of mines or oil and gas fields can result in significant shocks to a regional economy, generating jobs and drawing in capital from other regions and countries.
Explanation:
The three concerns that the residents of this area might be:
1) <span>The cost of not moving forward is extremely high, so they opposed the plan, as they think it would affect US economy
2) </span><span>Nuclear waste disposal capability is an environmental imperative, so their environment would be polluted by very radioactive materials.
3) </span>Demand for new nuclear plants also demands disposal capability which supports national security but again, their site will be no longer for them. But unfortunately, <span>Extensive studies consistently show Yucca Mountain to be a sound site for nuclear waste disposal so the plan can't be abolished.
Hope this helps!</span>