All categories

3 years ago

(4/x - z/y=0) (10/x+z/y=0)

Mathematics

1 answer:

galina1969 [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Some of the other answers are good examples of solving a system of three equations in three unknowns, which is what this problem is asking. Though the simplest way to solve this problem is actually to notice that, if we sum the three equations, we get:

X + Y = 10

X + Z = 20

+ Y + Z = 24

----------------

2X + 2Y + 2Z = 54

Factoring out the 2, we have 2(X + Y + Z) = 54, and dividing both sides by 2 reveals that X + Y + Z = 27.

Step-by-step explanation:

hopefully this helps

You might be interested in

Which choice is equivalent to the expression below?

Mars2501 [29]

There is no picture or expression

4 0

3 years ago

Which pair of functions is not a pair of inverse functions?

miss Akunina [59]

Answer:

the answer is D

the inverse should be -20x/x-1

and thank you i didnt know that the of f(x)=x⁵

is ⁵√x

(~￣³￣)~

5 0

3 years ago

Jolene bought a savings certificate that earned 2% in simple interest per year. She earned a total of $240 in interest over four

Travka [436]

The answer for your question is that it is 120

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The least total cost method (LTC) lot-sizing technique calculates the order quantity by comparing the carrying cost and the setu

rewona [7]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

The least total cost method is the method in which the total cost of the ordering cost and the total carrying cost is equal among various lot size available.

The order quantity should be choose when the total ordering cost and the total carrying cost equal to each other

The formula to compute the economic order quantity is shown below:

a. The computation of the economic order quantity is shown below:

$= \sqrt{\frac{2\times \text{Annual demand}\times \text{Ordering cost}}{\text{Carrying cost}}}$

It is always be expressed in units

The formula to compute the ordering cost is

$= \frac{Annual\ demand}{Economic\ order\ quantity}\times ordering\ cost\ per\ order$

And, the formula to compute the carrying cost is

$= \frac{Economic\ order\ quanity}{2}\times carrying\ cost\ per\ unit$

Hence, the given statement is true

8 0

3 years ago

Q: Marci wants to prove that the diagonals of

Trava [24]

Answer: Option B

She should use the fact that the

opposite sides of a parallelogram are

congruent and then use the

Pythagorean theorem.

We cannot use the diagonals of square property because this is a rectangle, opposite angles will also not work, and we cannot use the diagonal property because thats what we have to prove.

Must click thanks and mark brainliest

7 0

3 years ago