Answer:
I believe the evidence indicates the following environment:
This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.
Explanation:
According to the evidence, this environment is scarce in plant and animal life. Among the options given, the best ones would be tundra and desert. However, <u>the option concerning the tundra has a crucial mistake that makes it incorrect. </u>
<u>According to it, a tundra "is too hot for plant and animal to live in." However, a tundra is is an extremely cold biome consisting of snow-covered lands.</u> The tundra is, in other words, like a cold desert. <u>Both environments have little precipitation, which makes it harder for plant and animal life to thrive. </u>
<u>Since that option makes such a mistake, we can easily choose the one about the desert as the correct one: </u><u>This is a desert because there is little precipitation for plant and animal life to thrive.</u>
Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
The reason why Madison wanted to avoid war with Britain was that he felt the U.S. military was not as strong as the British.
The effect of the war on the people of New England was that they had to diversify their economy from sea trade.
The war was indeed a victory for the U.S. because they gained land from Spain and received British assurances to stay out of America's attempts to expand across the Great Lakes.
<h3>What happened in the War of 1812?</h3>
The British were taking Americans hostage to use in their navy and along with other reasons, both Britain and the U.S. were close to war.
President Madison did not think the Americans would win a superior British army at first however so he abstained from war and preferred economic sanctions.
These sanctions and the resulting war, meant that the New England Americans could not ship to England and France as well as they used to thanks also to British blockades.
They were therefore forced into finding other ways of making money. The Americans still won the war however because they inflicted heavy losses on the British and gained some land.
Find out more on the War of 1812 at brainly.com/question/382669.
Answer:
the automobile industry
Explanation:
I had done it on usatest prep
B sorry if it is wrong but I think this is totally right
