if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1
Answer:
$19200
Step-by-step explanation:
20,000*0.96=19200
Answer:
$50
Step-by-step explanation:
12 x 30 = 360
960 - 360 = 600
600/12 = 50
:) Brainliest pls?
Answer:
f(x) * g(x) = -35x^3 - 59x^2 - 74x - 72
Step-by-step explanation:
If f(x) = 7x+9 ang g(x) = -5x^2 - 2x - 8, then
f(x) * g(x) will be:
(7x+9)(-5x^2 - 2x -8)
f(x) * g(x) = -35x^3 - 59x^2 - 74x - 72
Answer:
What expressions are equivalent to 20
Step-by-step explanation:
since you didn't .show a link this is my guess, i guess.
4x5=20
