Majority can such as hydrogen H and oxygen O forming water H2O but uranium having extra neutrons to form plutonium and beyond simply can't because it will not last for a fraction of a second or spiral out of control and violently react like the little boy and the fat man (a uranium and plutonium nuclear weapon) so yes and no
The scatter plot that shows a positive correlation between force and acceleration.
<h3>What is the relationship between acceleration of an object and the applied force?</h3>
The acceleration of an object is the change in velocity with time.
- Acceleration = change in velocity/time
Force is defined as an agent which causes a change in the motion or state of rest of a body.
According to Newton's law of motion, the rate of change of velocity of an object is directly proportional to the applied force and takes place in the direction of the applied force.
Force and acceleration have a positive correlation.
Therefore, the scatter plot which will most closely match the measurements that the students will obtain is that which shows a positive correlation between force and acceleration.
In conclusion, acceleration of a object is proportional to the applied force.
Learn more about force and acceleration at: brainly.com/question/14343220
#SPJ1
Answer: You multiply and divide when rounding division significant figures
Explanation: Both multiplying and dividing significant figures have the same rule. That rule is, the FINAL ANSWER of a multiplication and division problem should be rounded to the number of significant figures that is the least amount of any figures used in the multiplication or division. Let us demonstrate below.
<span>Pre-1982 definition of STP: 37 g/mol
Post-1982 definition of STP: 38 g/mol
This problem is somewhat ambiguous because the definition of STP changed in 1982. Prior to 1982, the definition was 273.15 K at a pressure of 1 atmosphere (101325 Pascals). Since 1982, the definition is 273.15 K at a pressure of exactly 100000 Pascals). Because of those 2 different definitions, the volume of 1 mole of gas is either 22.414 Liters (pre 1982 definition), or 22.71098 liters (post 1982 definition). And finally, there's entirely too many text books out there that still use the 35 year obsolete definition. So let's solve this problem using both definitions and you need to pick the correct answer for the text book you're using.
First, determine how many moles of gas you have. Just simply divide the volume you have by the molar volume.
Pre-1982: 2.1 / 22.414 = 0.093691443 moles
Post-1982: 2.1 / 22.71098 = 0.092466287 moles
Now determine the molar mass. Simply divide the mass by the moles. So
Pre-1982: 3.5 g / 0.093691443 moles = 37.35666667 g/mol
Post-1982: 3.5 g / 0.092466287 moles = 37.85163333 g/mol
Finally, round to 2 significant figures. So
Pre-1982: 37 g/mol
Post-1982: 38 g/mol</span>
I THINK it's <span>1,1-Difluorononane, or </span>
.<span>
</span>
