True because the Americans put a deadly weapon Vietnam war. Also it was published by Daniel Ellsberg.
Hope this helps :)
The tendency to immediately recall the first and last items in a list better than the middle items is referred to as option(a) i.e, serial position effect.
The propensity for people to remember the first and last items in a list more clearly than the middle ones is known as the "serial position effect." The primacy effect and the recency effect are both parts of the serial position effect, a type of cognitive bias. As an illustration, suppose you created a grocery list and included products like toothpaste, milk, cheese, eggs, and chocolates.
The serial position effect explains how the sequential order of information affects human memory. It implies that the first and last elements in a series are the ones we can remember the easiest, while the middle ones are more difficult to recall.
The primacy effect and the recency effect work together to produce the serial position effect. Due to its ease of processing and storage in human long-term memory, the main effect makes the first things on a list simpler to remember.
To know more about serial position effect refer to: brainly.com/question/20630298
#SPJ4
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached nor context or specific references, we can say the following.
Who is most likely to embrace consequentialism?
The people who embrace consequentialism are the people who tend to believe that making the right thing is going to make them happy and is going to fulfill an internal desire. We are talking that follows the teachings and principles of Utilitarianism, a theory developed by John Stewart Mill.
This concept indicates that people will be happy if they do something that is correct and provides satisfaction to them. Or the opposite, they will be sad if they do something wrong.
The correct answer that would best complete the given statement above would be RACIAL DISPARITIES. <span>Widespread adoption of intermediate sanctions may further exacerbate racial disparities in prison populations. Intermediate sanctions is defined as </span><span>new punishment options developed to fill the gap between traditional probation and traditional jail or prison sentences </span>Hope this answers your question. Thanks for posting it.
