Answer:
76%
Step-by-step explanation:
First parts right
75.7% i think maybe
10/30) x (9/29) x (8/28) = 720 / 24,360
= 6 / 203 = 2.96 percent (rounded)
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Find a common denominator
To find a common denominator, find a multiple that both fractions have. In this case, the common denominator is 18 because 9 can get to 18 by 9 x 2 and 6 can get to 18 by 6 x 3.
2. Convert your fractions to both have a common denominator.
2/9 x 2/2 = 4/18 5/6 x 3/3 = 15/18
3. Compare
4/18 < 15/18 which means
2/9 < 5/6
Hope this helps!
The value of x is 4 and the value of ∠ABC is 68°.
To solve this problem we first have to understand the concept of an angle bisector. Angle bisector is a straight line passes through the vertex of an angle dividing the angle in two equal angles.
According to the condition BD bisects ∠ABC
Therefore the two angles formed by the angle bisector are ∠ABD and ∠CBD.
The angle value of these two angles are equal.
Given:
m∠ABD=11x-10
m∠CBD=8x+2
Therefore from the above condition:
m∠ABD=m∠CBD
Substituting the values we get:
11x-10=8x+2
Solving the linear equation to find the value of x.
Now let us find the value of ∠ABC
m∠ABC=m∠ABD+m∠CBD
or,∠ABC=11x-10+8x+2
or,∠ABC=19x-8
Substituting the value x=4 in the equation we get:
m∠ABC=19×4-8
or,m∠ABC=68°
Therefore we can conclude that the value of xis 4 and the value of ∠ABC is 68°.
To learn more about angle bisectors:
brainly.com/question/12896755
#SPJ9
Answer: No, the percentage of the fleet out of compliance is not different from their initial thought.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since we have given that
n = 22
x = 5
So,
he company initially believed that 20% of the fleet was out of compliance. Is this strong evidence the percentage of the fleet out of compliance is different from their initial thought.
so, p = 0.2
Hypothesis would be
So, the t test statistic value would be
Degree of freedom = df = n-1 = 22-1 =23
So, t{critical value} = 2.080
So, 2.080>0.353
so, we will accept the null hypothesis.
Hence, No, the percentage of the fleet out of compliance is not different from their initial thought.