The distance between two consecutive nodes and the amplitude after 0.56s are m/2 and 1.75×10^(-4) m respectively.
<h3>What's the distance between consecutive nodes of the displacement of air molecules?</h3>
- Wavelength is the distance between two consecutive nodes or toughs or crests or anti-nodes.
- So, distance between consecutive nodes = wavelength = 2π÷k
= 2π/(4π÷m)
= m/2
<h3>What's the amplitude after 0.56s of the displacement of air molecules?</h3>
Displacement after 0.56 s = 0.008×cos(50π×0.56s)
=1.75×10^(-4) m
Thus, we can conclude that the distance between consecutive nodes and displacement after 0.56 s are m/2 and 1.75×10^(-4) m respectively.
Disclaimer: The question was given incomplete on the portal. Here is the complete question.
Question: The particle displacement y of air molecules due to a sound wave is given by y=0.008coswtsinkz where k=4π÷m and w=50π rads/s.
Calculate:
I) the distance between 2 consecutive nodes
ii) the amplitude after 0.565s
Learn more about the wavelength here:
brainly.com/question/10750459
#SPJ1
Acids are danger so stay away
Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic
Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.
First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.
Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.
I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.
So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.
So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).
Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.
The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).
I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx
Juan lives a hundred miles away from Bill then the average speed that he reaches Bill's Home in 50 seconds means that Juan lives 50 seconds away from bill because 50 + 50 seconds equals 100 seconds so Juansorry my bad Juan lives 50 miles away from Belle but he probably how I must have run to get to bill in 50 seconds .
Answer:
x component 60.85 m
y component 101.031 m
Explanation:
We have given distance r = 118 km
Angle which makes from ground = 58.9°
(a) X component of distance is given by 
(b) Y component of distance is given by 
These are the x and y component of position vector