Answer:Although the Quadratic Formula always works as a strategy to solve quadratic equations, for many problems it is not the most efficient method. Sometimes it is faster to factor or complete the square or even just "out-think" the problem. For each equation below, choose the method you think is most efficient to solve the equation and explain your reason. Note that you do not actually need to solve the equation. a. x2+7x−8=0x
2
+7x−8=0, b. (x+2)2=49(x+2)
2
=49, c. 5x2−x−7=05x
2
−x−7=0, d. x2+4x=−1x
2
+4x=−1.
Answer:
Im pretty sure its a :3
Step-by-step explanation:
An easy way for me to do this is to either make all of the fractions into decimals or all the decimals into fractions, whatever you prefer. I prefer fractions, but for typing reasons I’m going to make them all decimals. Making 5/48 into a decimal you divide 5 by 48 and get 0.104... and divide 3 by 16 and get 0.1875. Then from there, look at whatever tenths place number is the least (the number after the decimal). Two of them have one, so moving onto the next number, 8>0, which means 0.104 is less then 0.1875. Then 5<7. So from least to greatest, 5/48 (0.104), 3/16 (0.1875), 0.5, 0.75.
Good Luck!
The answers to the questions on how she would use the colored chips are given here:
- writing a new article 6 yellow chips
- designing a computer presentation 10 red chips
<h3>How to solve for the values</h3>
For the first percentage
20 / 100 = x/20
= 20 * 20 = 100x
400 = 100x
divide through by 100
x = 400/100
x = 4
For the second percentage
30/100 = x/20
600 = 100x
x = 600/100
x = 6
For the last
50/100 = x/20
1000 = 100x
x = 10
The proof is that 6 + 4 + 10 still gives us 20
Read more on percentages here: brainly.com/question/24877689
#SPJ1
If putting 5.2 and 4.5 in fraction form, her error must have been timing 3 by 3 to 5.2 and 4.5 as a fraction. Meaning that 5.5 and 4.8 is wrong
