<span>His conclusions from the Conflict theoretical perspective. The
theory of conflict is a sociological and psychological theory in which
the material, social and political interpretation of history is
emphasized. Mainly about conflicts of power or class of a specific period of history, or of a specific country or culture. <span>One
of his greatest theorists is Karl Marx, who analyzed history through
various economic phases and knows his theory as Marxism.
I hope my answer can help you.
</span></span>
The correct answer is D. Naturalistic
Explanation:
Howard Gardner is a developmental psychologist mainly known for his Theory of Multiple Intelligences in which Howard states human intelligence has different modalities classified into eight main abilities that follow a criteria established by Howard, these abilities or types of intelligence are the musical-rhythm, the intrapersonal, the verbal-linguistic, the logical-mathematical, the interpersonal, the naturalistic, the kinesthetic and the visual-spatial. In the case of the naturalistic, this was proposed in 1995 and it is related to the ability to connect information form the natural surroundings or to have ecological perceptiveness. Therefore, form the options provided the one that is part of Howard Garnder's multiple intelligences is Naturalistic.
Answer:
C. The Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves only in states that had seceded from the Union.
Explanation:
Basically, the work of a historians mostly relies on studying and examining different kinds of historical sources and using them to shed a light on historical events. Of course, this is only a brief and simplified summary of their job.
But the most important thing is that they need to use facts and factual evidence.
Only answer C results from examinations of a historical material source (The Emancipation Proclamation, a written document). In that way it presents a strong evidence, which can easily be checked and verified, that support the claim.
Other answers express only opinions, without providing any evidence, and as such should never be used by historians, especially answer D which is an example of a logical fallacy.
