Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
41/6 = - 41/6 = - 6 5/6 = - 6.833333333333; Result written as a negative improper fraction, a mixed number (also called a mixed fraction) and a decimal number. Ordinary (simple, common) math fraction reducing to lowest terms (simplifying), answer with explanations below.
The perimeter of a rectangle is calculated as
Perimeter= 2(length + breadth )
So, Perimeter = 2*length + 2*breadth
Now we are given the length as 34.2 meters and breadth as 27.8 meters
So the perimeter will be
2(34.2+27.8) meters

which equals 2(62) meters
Hence Perimeter = 124 meters