Answer:
negative force
Explanation:
Here woman is applying the force to stop the child or to prevent him from running.
Here we know that the force applied by the woman is opposite to the motion of child but here the child is not displaced by this applied force but the child is only prevented his running.
So here the work done by the woman is zero as there is no displacement by this force.
But here we can say that the the force of woman is against the motion of child so here this force is opposite force and hence it is termed as negative force here.
so correct answer will be
negative force
Yes it is possible. Momentum is calculated by the mass of the object times its velocity.
For example, say a bowling ball weighs 3.0kg and is travelling at a speed of 3.0m/s. Its momentum would be 3.0×3.0=9.0 kg·m/s.
Now say we have a baseball weighing 0.20kg and it is travelling at a speed of 47.0m/s. Its momentum would be 0.20×47.0=9.4 kg·m/s, which is more than that of the bowling ball.
V = final velocity
u = initial velocity
a = acceleration
s = displacement
Take downward direction as positive.
v^2 = u^2 + 2as
v^2 = 0.8^2 + 2(1.6)(5.5)
v^2 = 18.24
v = 4.27 m/s
Column A: x-axis, input, domain
Column B: y-axis, output, range
Those are other ways to describe them
hope i helped:)
a) 1.57 m/s
The sock spins once every 2.0 seconds, so its period is
T = 2.0 s
Therefore, the angular velocity of the sock is

The linear speed of the sock is given by

where
is the angular velocity
r = 0.50 m is the radius of the circular path of the sock
Substituting, we find:

B) Faster
In this case, the drum is twice as wide, so the new radius of the circular path of the sock is twice the previous one:

At the same time, the drum spins at the same frequency as before, therefore the angular frequency as not changed:

Therefore, the new linear speed would be:

And substituting,

So, we see that the linear speed has doubled.