1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
serg [7]
2 years ago
14

If a ball rolling down a hill is half way between the top and bottom, how much potential energy does the ball have compared to k

inetic energy?
Chemistry
1 answer:
madreJ [45]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy of this ball should be equal (assuming that there is no energy loss due to friction.)

Explanation:

The ball loses gravitational potential energy as it rolls down the hill. At the same time, the speed of the ball increases, such that the ball gains kinetic energy.

If there is no friction on this ball (and that the ball did not deshape,) all the gravitational potential energy that this ball lost would be converted to kinetic energy.

If the gravitational field strength g is constant throughout, the gravitational potential energy of an object in that gravitational field would be proportional to its height.

If m denote the mass of this ball, the gravitational potential energy (\rm GPE) of this ball at height h would be {\rm GPE} = (m \cdot g) \cdot h, which is proportional to h\!.

The value of g near the surface of the earth is indeed approximately constant (typically g \approx 9.8\; \rm m \cdot s^{-2}.)

At halfway between the top and bottom of this hill, the height of this ball would be (1/2) of its initial value (the value when the ball was at the top of the hill.) Because the \rm GPE of this ball is proportional to its height, at halfway down the hill, the \rm GPE\! of this ball would also be (1/2)\! its initial value.

However, if there was no friction on this ball (and that the ball did not deshape,) that (1/2) of the initial \rm GPE\! of this ball was not lost. Rather, these (1/2)\! of the initial \rm GPE would have been converted to the kinetic energy (\rm KE) of this ball.

Hence, when the ball is halfway down the hill:

\displaystyle \text{GPE halfway down the hill} = \frac{1}{2}\, \text{Initial GPE}.

\begin{aligned}& \text{KE halfway down the hill}\\  &= \text{Initial GPE} - \text{GPE halfway down the hill}\\ &= \text{Initial GPE} - \frac{1}{2}\, \text{initial GPE}\\ &= \frac{1}{2}\, \text{Initial GPE}\end{aligned}.

Therefore:

\begin{aligned}& \text{GPE halfway down the hill} \\ &= \frac{1}{2}\, \text{Initial GPE} \\ &= \text{KE halfway down the hill}\end{aligned}.

In other words, under these assumptions, when this ball is halfway down the hill, the gravitational potential energy and the kinetic energy of this ball would be equal.

You might be interested in
What is the wavenumber of the radiation emitted when a hydrogen
LUCKY_DIMON [66]

Answer: Wavenumber of the radiation emitted  is 0.08\times 10^{8}m^{-1}

Explanation:

The relationship between wavelength and energy of the wave follows the equation:

E=\frac{hc}{\lambda}

where,

E = energy of the radiation = 1.634\times 10^{-18}J

h = Planck's constant  = 6.626\times 10^{-34}Js

c = speed of light = 3\times 10^8m/s

\lambda = wavelength of radiation = ?

Putting values in above equation, we get:

1.634\times 10^{-18}J=\frac{(6.626\times 10^{-34}Js)\times (3\times 10^8m/s)}{\lambda}\\\\\lambda=12.16\times 10^{-8}m

\bar {\nu}=\frac{1}{\lambda}=\frac{1}{12.16\times 10^{-8}}=0.08\times 10^{8}m^{-1}

Thus wavenumber of the radiation emitted  is 0.08\times 10^{8}m^{-1}

8 0
3 years ago
ANSWER QUICK I AM RUNNING OUT OF TIME WILL BRAINLY, FRIEND, THANK, RATE YOU CAN PICK IF ANSWER CORRECTLY i have 6 ?s ANSWER I WI
Delvig [45]
Here are the answers. A,A,A,C,A,C. 

I hope this helps!
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
URGENTTTTT What is the correct formula when Al+3 combines with CrO4-2
PIT_PIT [208]
A and C are incorrect because they are not complete transfer of valence electrons. Ionic bonds best to form a neutral molecule
8 0
3 years ago
Does anyone know how to write out the formula for these?? not just the answer x
Tju [1.3M]
Idk how to write the formula I had this same question
5 0
3 years ago
Will the water level of the sea increase when there is global warming
alexdok [17]
Global warming will cause see levels to rise since a lot of water is stored in ice sheets which will melt.  All of the melt water will end up in the ocean causing sea levels to rise.

I hope this helps.  Let me know if anything is unclear.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Solid sodium reacts with liquid water to form hydrogen gas according to the equation 2 Na(s) + 2 H₂O(l) → 2 NaOH(aq) + H₂(g) Wha
    15·1 answer
  • A sample of cacl2⋅2h2o/k2c2o4⋅h2o solid salt mixture is dissolved in ~150 ml de-ionized h2o. the oven dried precipitate has a ma
    10·2 answers
  • What does the body do with the chemical energy of food that is not converted to the chemical energy of ATP? a. Stores it in the
    10·1 answer
  • 11 swimming pool water can be kept free of harmful bacteria by adding aqueous sodium chlorate(i),naocl. this reacts with water t
    15·1 answer
  • This is the energy of motion and position - Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy are included here.
    12·1 answer
  • In the electron cloud model, the electron cloud is denser in some locations than in others. What do the denser areas represent?
    6·2 answers
  • 5. What are the two types of pure substances ?
    9·1 answer
  • The molarity of a solution that contains 8.0 g of NaOH in a liter of solution is
    14·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between the atomic mass of a substance and its molar mass?
    5·1 answer
  • Hurry need the answer asap
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!