3x-4 = -10
3x-4 +4 = -10 +4
3x = -6
then you can divide it :
x = -6 : 3
x= -2
Answer:
the 2nd
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Type I: 1.9%, Type II: 1.6%
Step-by-step explanation:
given null hypothesis
H0=the individual has not taken steroids.
type 1 error-falsely rejecting the null hypothesis
⇒ actually the null hypothesis is true⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
but we rejected it ⇒our prediction is the individual has taken steroids.
typr II error- not rejecting null hypothesis when it has to be rejected
⇒actually null hypothesis is false ⇒the individual has taken steroids.
but we didnt reject⇒the individual has not taken steroids.
let us denote
the individual has taken steroids by 1
the individual has not taken steroids.by 0
predicted
1 0
actual 1 98.4% 1.6%
0 1.9% 98.1%
so for type 1 error
actual-0
predicted-1
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.9%=0.019
so for type II error
actual-1
predicted-0
therefore from above table we can see that probability of Type I error is 1.6%=0.016
Putting the other player's king in check is always a good move. true
<h3>What is chess?</h3>
- The policies of chess allow a king to take an opponent's piece whilst in check, so long as that piece isn't always being defended.
- At the equal time, a king in the test is usually forced to move.
- The standard regulations of chess, a participant may not make any pass that places or leaves their king in the test.
- A player may additionally pass the king, seize the threatening piece, or block the check with some other piece.
- A king cannot look at the opposing king, considering this will vicinity the first king in check as well.
Learn more about chess here:-
#SPJ2
