I'm thinking this is what the problem looks like:

. The first thing to do is to move the

over to the other side because it has a common denominator with the other side. Doing that and at the same time combining them over their common denominator looks like this:

. The best way to solve for x now is to cross-multiply to get 3(4-x)=-4(x-4). Distributing through the parenthesis is 12 - 3x = -4x + 16. Solving for x gives us x = 4. Of course when we sub a 4 back in for x we get real problems, don't we? Dividing by zero breaks every rule in math that there ever was! So, yes, the solution is extraneous.
Answer:
bujvunvyjctn
Step-by-step explanation:
v uh yhfnx zhjd dd djsi dh
Sorry i dont know but if you want points you could spam things like this and get points
Step-by-step explanation:
the answer as shown in the photo
Answer:
18
Step-by-step explanation:
(-2)+(5 + 5)2
(-2)+(10)2
(-2)+20
-2+20=18
System of linear equations
A set of two or more linear equations containing two or more variables.
2x + 3y = −1
x − 3y = 4