Answer: A balanced equation for the given reaction is
.
Explanation:
The reaction equation will be as follows.

Number of atoms on the reactant side is as follows.
Number of atoms on the product side is as follows.
Since number of atoms on both the reactant and product sides are equal. Hence, the reaction equation is balanced.
Thus, we can conclude that a balanced equation for the given reaction is
.
This is a straightforward dilution calculation that can be done using the equation
where <em>M</em>₁ and <em>M</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) molar concentrations of the solution, respectively, and <em>V</em>₁ and <em>V</em>₂ are the initial and final (or undiluted and diluted) volumes of the solution, respectively.
Here, we have the initial concentration (<em>M</em>₁) and the initial (<em>V</em>₁) and final (<em>V</em>₂) volumes, and we want to find the final concentration (<em>M</em>₂), or the concentration of the solution after dilution. So, we can rearrange our equation to solve for <em>M</em>₂:

Substituting in our values, we get
![\[M_2=\frac{\left ( 50 \text{ mL} \right )\left ( 0.235 \text{ M} \right )}{\left ( 200.0 \text{ mL} \right )}= 0.05875 \text{ M}\].](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5BM_2%3D%5Cfrac%7B%5Cleft%20%28%2050%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%5Cleft%20%28%200.235%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%7B%5Cleft%20%28%20200.0%20%5Ctext%7B%20mL%7D%20%5Cright%20%29%7D%3D%200.05875%20%5Ctext%7B%20M%7D%5C%5D.)
So the concentration of the diluted solution is 0.05875 M. You can round that value if necessary according to the appropriate number of sig figs. Note that we don't have to convert our volumes from mL to L since their conversion factors would cancel out anyway; what's important is the ratio of the volumes, which would be the same whether they're presented in milliliters or liters.
C a solution because salt is a solute
Answer:
1 - e, 2 - k, 3 - a, 4 - i, 5 - b,
Explanation:
The ratio of the amount of analyte in the stationary phase to the amount in the mobile phase. --- Retention factor.
Time it takes after sample injection into the column for the analyte peak to appear as it exits the column. -- Retention time
The process of extracting a component that is adsorbed to a given material by use of an appropriate solvent system. -- Elution
Measure of chromatographic column efficiency. The greater its value, the more efficient the column. -- Theoretical plate number
Gas, liquid, or supercritical fluid used to transport the sample in chromatographic separations. -- Mobile phase
Immiscible and immobile, it is packed within a column or coated on a solid surface. -- Stationary phase
Answer:
The attractive force is negative and MgO has a higher melting point
Explanation:
From Couloumb's law:
Energy of interaction, E = k 
where q1 and q2 are the charges of the ions, k is Coulomb's constant and r is the distance between both ions, i.e the atomic radii of the ions.
If you look at Coulomb's law, you note that in the force is negative (because q1 is negative while q2 is positive).
In addition to that, the compounds MgO and NaF have similar combined ionic radii, then we can determine the melting point trend from the amount of energy gotten
The melting point of ionic compounds is determined by 1. charge on the ions 2. size of ions. while NaF has smaller charges (+1 and -1), MgO (+2 and -2) has larger charges and greater combined atomic radii. This implies that the compound with greater force would have a higher melting point.
Hence the compound MgO would have a higher melting point than NaF.