F(x) = -9 + 10.3x probably.
It's definitely not the first or last option as they have negative gradients (i.e. negative x-coefficient) and so represent a negative correlation. The data given tells us there is a positive gradient and so a positive correlation.
It could be the second option as the second and third are not so vastly different but I would go for the third because it appears to most closely fit the data pattern.
The answer could be 700÷30 or 690÷30.
Consider two <u>right triangles</u>:
1. ΔABC with <u>vertices</u> A(0,0), B(0,2), C(6,0). Then AB is perpendicular to AC and AB=2 units (<u>vertical leg</u>), AC=6 units (<u>horizontal leg</u>).
2. ΔXYZ with vertices X(6,-10), Y(6,0), Z(36,-10). Then XY is perpendicular to XZ and XY=10 units (vrrtical leg), XZ=30 units (horizontal leg).
The equation of the line BC is
Check whether points Y and Z lie on this line:
Y(6,0): - true;
Z(36,-10): - true.
Answer: the hypotenuses of these two triangles could lie along the same line
Answer:
Based on the conditions we see that the function never pases through x=2 so then we know that x=2 is not on the domain of f. And we can create the following function who satisfy the conditions:
And we can see that we have a vertical asymptote in x =2 and is negative always on the interval (-∞, 2) and always positive on the interval (2, ∞).
And we can see the function in the figure attached.
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case we need a function that satisfy that is negative on the interval (-∞, 2) and positive on the interval (2, ∞).
Based on the conditions we see that the function never pases through x=2 so then we know that x=2 is not on the domain of f. And we can create the following function who satisfy the conditions:
And we can see that we have a vertical asymptote in x =2 and is negative always on the interval (-∞, 2) and always positive on the interval (2, ∞).
And we can see the function in the figure attached.
Answer:
MMMMMMM DEVIOUS DEVIOUS LICK
Step-by-step explanation:
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMm