Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
When civilizations share two languages, bilingualism typically occurs along country borders, option B is the <u>correct</u> answer.
<h3>What is Bilingualism?</h3>
Bilingualism is defined as the presence of multiple languages in a country, state, or community.
Bilingualism improves cognitive capacities, and bilinguals are more creative and adaptable.
They are more open-minded, and they find it easier to focus on multiple things at the same time.
If two countries are not on good terms, embargoes, xenophobia, and sanctioning may occur.
For more information about language sharing, refer below
brainly.com/question/2465059
Uban revolutionaries intercepted the letter from the mail and released it to the Hearst<span> press, which published it on February 9, 1898, in the </span>New York Journal<span>, in an article titled "Worst Insult to the United States in its History." Much of the press in New York began to demand De Lôme's resignation, and Hearst's </span>New York Journal<span> began a "Go Home De Lôme" campaign. These campaigns did, ultimately, lead to De Lôme's resignation. De Lôme’s unflattering remarks about McKinley helped fuel the United States of America's aggressive, warlike foreign policy.</span><span>[citation needed]</span><span> Two months later, on April 11, 1898, McKinley delivered a war message to Congress asking for "forcible intervention" by the United States to establish peace in Cuba </span>
Front-loading is the process scheduling presidential primaries early in the primary season.
Option a
<u>Explanation: </u>
Front-loading is defined as a phenomenon or process of multiple states opting to schedule their own elections at the beginning or the ‘front’ of the election season. Hence, the front-loading as more and more states schedule their primaries in the early primary season of an election cycle.
The other options are nowhere near the description for this process, hence making option ‘a’ the correct answer. Front-loading is usually opted for so that the states could have a greater say and influence on the process, as it helps them get elected earlier usually making the elections occur in January/February, as opposed to states that have it occur in the months of June as the races tend to be over by then.
