Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
John Muir was associated with the issue of conservation.
Answer: Option D
<u>Explanation:
</u>
John Muir is regarded as one of the greatest environmental philosophers the world has ever had. His stand for the conversation of the environment was remarkable and is still taken reference from by the new age conservationists.
The idea of having protected national parks was first put forward by John Muir. For that reason alone, he is called the father of national parks.
I believe the answer is: Disaster
In a drama, disaster genre revolved around a certain devastating event that faced in a society where the main character live. The story line would depict how the main characters react to the disaster and attempted to survive or stop the disaster.
