Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Substage 3
develops schematic ideas
deliberate actions focus on
repeating interesting effects
direct imitation
focused on self
simple associations
increased physical skills
enable infant to handle materials
more effectively
Activities included are
reaches for and grasps objects, manipulates items
repeats interesting or surprising
actions
copies another baby banging with a
wooden spoon
links objects by function
sits and passes toy from one hand to
the other
Psychological experience does not result in physical changes to the nervous system but can still influence
Answer:
it has absolute power within its own territory.
Explanation:
I don't have an explanation other then once I saw someone didn't get the other answer correct I googled more and came up with that.
His older brother's name is Erik
