Answer:
The answer is "
".
Step-by-step explanation:
Given value:
4 40 32
Solution:

If we divide the value by 4 it will give 10 and 8.

If we add the boxed value it will be equal to 72 and divide the value by 4 it will give a value 18.

9514 1404 393
Answer:
b. 17°
Step-by-step explanation:
All of the angles are 2nd-quadrant angles except 17°, which is a 1st-quadrant angle.
17° is the odd angle
__
When you compute ...
mod(angle, 360), you get 163, 17, 163, 163.
Answer:
458.838
Step-by-step explanation:
28 x 16.387 = <u>458.838</u>
<h3>
Answer: Choice B</h3>
No, this is not a plausible value for the population mean, because 5 is not within the 95% confidence interval.
====================================================
Explanation:
The greek letter mu is the population mean. It has the symbol
which looks like the letter 'u' but with a tail at the front or left side.
The question is asking if mu = 5 is plausible if the researcher found the 95% confidence interval to be 5.2 < mu < 7.8
We see that 5 is <u>not</u> in that interval. It's a bit to the left of 5.2
Since mu = 5 is not in the interval, it's not a plausible value for the population mean.
Have we ruled it out with 100% confidence? No. Such a thing is not possible. There's always room for (slight) error. The researcher would need to do a census to be fully confident; however, such practices are very time consuming and expensive. This is the main reason why statistics is important to try to estimate the population with a sample.