Scientific laws and theories have different jobs to do. A scientific law predicts the results of certain initial conditions. ... In contrast, a theory tries to provide the most logical explanation about why things happen as they do.
Answer:
ΔG°rxn = -69.0 kJ
Explanation:
Let's consider the following thermochemical equation.
N₂O(g) + NO₂(g) → 3 NO(g) ΔG°rxn = -23.0 kJ
Since ΔG°rxn < 0, this reaction is exergonic, that is, 23.0 kJ of energy are released. The Gibbs free energy is an extensive property, meaning that it depends on the amount of matter. Then, if we multiply the amount of matter by 3 (by multiplying the stoichiometric coefficients by 3), the ΔG°rxn will also be tripled.
3 N₂O(g) + 3 NO₂(g) → 9 NO(g) ΔG°rxn = -69.0 kJ
Answer: XF8
Explanation:
Empirical Formular shows the simplest ratio of elements in a compound.
Xe = 46.3% F = 53.7%
Divide the percentage composition of each element by the atomic mass.
Xe = 46.3/ 131.3 F= 53.7/ 19
= 0.353( approx) = 2.826 (approx)
Divide through with the smallest of the answers gotten in previous step.
Xe = 0.353 / 0.353 F = 2.826/ 0.353
= 1 = 8.0
Empirical formular = XF8
It decreases since a air less balloon is heavier than a Aired balloon
Answer:
Square planar.
Explanation:
Hello,
In this case, it can be demonstrated that the central atom Xenon in XeF₄ has a sp³d² hybridization which means that its geometry is likely to be octahedral. Nevertheless Applying by applying the valence shell electron pair repulsion (VSEPR) model to in order to minimize the repulsion among lone pairs, bond pairs and lone pair-bond pairs, we we realize repulsion is actually minimized when lone pairs are anti to one another and the fluorine atoms are in equatorial position, for that reason, the corrected and properly exhibited geometry or molecular arrangement of the compound turns out square planar. You can verify it on the attached picture.
Regards.