Answer:
4.4
Step-by-step explanation:
Write the question out as an equation:
7+x/3 = 2x - 5
Rearrange , simplify and solve:
7+x = 3(2x-5) = 6x - 15
7+x = 6x-15
6x - 15 = 7+x
6x = 7+x+15 = 22+x
6x = 22+x
6x-x = 22
5x = 22
x = 4.4
hope this helps.
Good Luck.
Please Mark Brainiest
Answer:
y = -3
Step-by-step explanation:
{y = x/2 - 4
y = 1 - 2 x
Substitute y = x/2 - 4 into the second equation:
{y = x/2 - 4
x/2 - 4 = 1 - 2 x
In the second equation, look to solve for x:
{y = x/2 - 4
x/2 - 4 = 1 - 2 x
Add 2 x + 4 to both sides:
{y = x/2 - 4
(5 x)/2 = 5
Multiply both sides by 2/5:
{y = x/2 - 4
x = 2
Substitute x = 2 into the first equation:
{y = -3
x = 2
Collect results in alphabetical order:
Answer:
{x = 2
y = -3
Answer:
old per: 1280
new per:2560
Step-by-step explanation:
first perimeter u get it by adding all the sides and since its a square then all the sides are equal so u can just do
320*4 which is equal to 1280
and by doubling the sides u can just double it in the old equation meaning
(320*2)*4
which is equal to 2560
Answer:
the answer to the question is 8
Answer:
See explanation below
Step-by-step explanation:
Here, a director of manufacturing must convince management that a proposed manufacturing method reduces costs before the new method can be implemented. The current production method operates with a mean cost of $220 per hour.
a) The alternative and null hypotheses would be:
H0: μ ≥ 220
Ha: μ < 220
b) Comment on the conclusion when H0 cannot be rejected:
When we fail to reject the null hypothesis H0, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method cannot be implemented.
c) Comment on the conclusion when H0 can be rejected:
When the null hypothesis, H0 is rejected, there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean cost can be reduced from from $220. Therefore the manager's proposed method can be implemented.
