The third equation of free fall can be applied to determine the acceleration. So that Paola's acceleration during the flight is 39.80 m/
.
Acceleration is a quantity that has a direct relationship with velocity and also inversely proportional to the time taken. It is a vector quantity.
To determine Paola's acceleration, the third equation of free fall is appropriate.
i.e 
= 
± 2as
where: V is the final velocity, U is the initial velocity, a is the acceleration, and s is the distance covered.
From the given question, s = 20.1 cm (0.201 m), U = 4.0 m/s, V = 0.
So that since Poala flies against gravity, then we have:
= - 2as
0 = 
- 2(a x 0.201)
= 16 - 0.402a
0.402a = 16
a = 
= 39.801
a = 39.80 m/
Therefore Paola's acceleration is 39.80 m/.
Visit: brainly.com/question/17493533
Answer:
The work is -67.76 J
Explanation:
The law of conservation of energy is considered one of one of the fundamental laws of physics and states that the total energy of an isolated system remains constant. except when it is transformed into other types of energy.
This is summed up in the principle that energy can neither be created nor destroyed in the universe, only transformed into other forms of energy.
In this case you must calculate the loss of kinetic energy. This loss is actually the work done against the resistive force in the air. Friction is the only force other than gravity that acts on the ball.
So, the loss of kinetic energy is 
You know:
- mass=m=0.22 kg
- Initial velocity of the ball:
Final velocity of the ball: 
Replacing:
= -67.76 J
Friction work is always negative because friction is always against displacement.
<u><em>The work is -67.76 J</em></u>
Answer:
I remember learning about this in health class. I believe the answer is quality of life.
Explanation:
Answer:
Recall the Diffraction grating formula for constructive interference of a light
y = nDλ/w Eqn 1
Where;
w = width of slit = 1/15000in =6.67x10⁻⁵in =
6.67x10⁻⁵ x 0.0254m = 1.69x10⁻⁶m
D = distance to screen
λ = wavelength of light
n = order number = 1
Given
y1 = ? from 1st order max to the central
D = 2.66 m
λ = 633 x 10-9 m
and n = 1
y₁ = 0.994m
Distance (m) from the central maximum (n = 0) is the first-order maximum (n = 1) = 0.994m
Q b. How far (m) from the central maximum (m = 0) is the second-order maximum (m = 2) observed?
w = width of slit = 1/15000in =6.67x10⁻⁵in =
6.67x10⁻⁵ x 0.0254m = 1.69x10⁻⁶m
D = distance to screen
λ = wavelength of light
n = order number = 1
Given
y1 = ? from 1st order max to the central
D = 2.66 m
λ = 633 x 10⁻⁹ m
and n = 2
y₂ = 0.994m
Distance (m) from the central maximum (n = 0) is the first-order maximum (n = 2) =1.99m
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
--- initial volume
--- initial temperature
--- final temperature
--- coefficient of thermal expansion:
Required
The change in volume
To do this, we make use of cubic expansivity formula
So, we have:
The volume will expand by 
