1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harlamova29_29 [7]
3 years ago
9

An object moves in a direction parallel to its length with a velocity that approaches the velocity of light. The length of this

object, as measured by a stationary observer:________
a. approaches infinity.
b. approaches zero.
c. increases slightly.
d. does not change.
Physics
1 answer:
True [87]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

b. approaches zero.

Explanation:

The phenomenon is known as length contraction.

Length contraction is a result of Einstein's special theory of relativity. This theory states that an observer in an inertial frame of reference will observe a decrease in the length of any moving object placed at another inertial frame of reference.

let the length of the train = L

Let the length observed when the train is in motion = L₀

Apply Einstein's special theory of relativity;

L_0 = L \times \sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}  } \\\\where;\\\\v \ is \ the \ velocity \ of \ the \ train\\\\c \ is \ the \ speed \ of \ light\\\\

from the equation above, when v = 0, the length observed is equal to the initial length of the train. (L₀ = L)

As the velocity of the train (v) approaches the speed of light (c), the length of the train observed (L₀) becomes smaller than the initial length of the train (L).  (L₀ < L)

Eventually, when v equals c, we will have a square root of zero (0), and the length observed will become zero.  (L₀ = 0)

Thus, the length of this object, as measured by a stationary observer approaches zero

You might be interested in
Un móvil se desplaza con una rapidez inicial de 100 km/h, se le aplican los frenos con una
KIM [24]

Answer:

in English please I am quite puzzled

4 0
3 years ago
How do I do this physics problem about potential energy and kinetic energy?
larisa86 [58]

Ok i apologise for the messy working but I'll try and explain my attempt at logic

Also note i ignore any air resistance for this.

First i wrote the two equations I'd most likely need for this situation, the kinetic energy equation and the potential energy equation.

Because the energy right at the top of the swing motion is equal to the energy right in the "bottom" of the swing's motion (due to conservation of energy), i made the kinetic energy equal to the potential energy as indicated by Ek = Ep.

I also noted the "initial" and "final" height of the swing with hi and hf respectively.

So initially looking at this i thought, what the heck, there's no mass. Then i figured that using the conservation of energy law i could take the mass value from the Ek equation and use it in the Ep equation. So what i did was take the Ek equation and rearranged it for m as you can hopefully see. Then i substituted the rearranged Ek equation into the Ep equation.

So then the equation reads something like Ep = (rearranged Ek equation for m) × g (which is -9.81) × change in height (hf - hi).

Then i simplify the equation a little. When i multiply both sides by v^2 i can clearly see that there is one E on each side (at that stage i don't need to clarify which type of energy it is because Ek = Ep so they're just the same anyway). So i just canceled them out and square rooted both sides.

The answer i got was that the max velocity would be 4.85m/s 3sf, assuming no losses (eg energy lost to friction).

I do hope I'm right and i suppose it's better than a blank piece of paper good luck my dude xx

4 0
3 years ago
Ground reaction force acting on carter
mezya [45]
We don't know Carter, and we don't know where he is or what
he's doing, so I'm taking a big chance speculating on an answer.

I'm going to say that if Carter is pretty much just standing there,
or, let's say, lying on the ground taking a nap, then the force of
the ground acting on him is precisely exactly equal to his weight.
8 0
3 years ago
A. How does the speed of light in a vacuum change when observed from two different frames of reference?
anyanavicka [17]

a) It is absolute, so it does not change.

b) Inertial ones.

c) Inside the train the time will slow down relatively to the outside clock. So if one travel at nearly the speed if light for 2 hours on his clock, for outdoor observers it will look like 3 hours.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is copper NOT used as a filament?
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

Short answer, because copper wire does not have high resistance.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Do you know which component of the Star Wars movies is possible according to our current understanding of physics?
    9·1 answer
  • Soundproof rooms take advantage of which property of waves
    7·2 answers
  • a baseball pitcher throws a fastball at 42 meters per second. if the batter is 18 meters from the pitcher, approximately how muc
    6·2 answers
  • What net force is required to cause a 1600 kg car to accelerate at a rate of 4.0
    9·1 answer
  • Can you change your mass without changing your weight?
    9·1 answer
  • State the law of conservation of energy in your own words
    12·1 answer
  • a ball is projected horizontally from the top of a hill with a velocity of 30 m per second if it reaches the ground 5 seconds la
    6·2 answers
  • What force is needed to accelerate 300kg rock as a rste of 4m/s​
    6·2 answers
  • What would happen if the louisiana purchase did not double the United States?
    13·1 answer
  • 25 points please help PLEASE
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!