I think this is what you're after:
Cs(g) → Cs^+ + e⁻ ΔHIP = 375.7 kJ mol^-1 [1]
Convert to J and divide by the Avogadro Const to give E in J per photon
E = 375700/6.022×10^23 = 6.239×10^-19 J
Plank relationship E = h×ν E in J ν = frequency (Hz s-1)
Planck constant h = 6.626×10^-34 J s
6.239×10^-19 = (6.626×10^-34)ν
ν = 9.42×10^14 s^-1 (Hz)
IP are usually given in ev Cs 3.894 eV
<span>E = 3.894×1.60×10^-19 = 6.230×10^-19 J per photon </span>
Answer: Wheel and Axle
Both of these work together to form a simple machine. You can't have one without the other.
If you try to turn just the axle itself, then you'll find it takes a lot of work. This is because the inertia of the axle wants to keep the object at rest. Also, you won't have a lot of torque due to the small radius compared to what a doorknob can offer.
Using a doorknob is like putting a (steering) wheel on an axle. This increases the radius and therefore increases the torque. You put in less work into the system and get more out of it.
The electronic configuration is for iron (Fe) because if you add all those power up it will give you 26 and it’s the atomic number of Fe
Answer:
(c) The retention time would be higher (d) The retention time would be lower.
Explanation:
For the polar solutes which were separated using the hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) with a strongly polar bonded phase, the retention time would be higher if eluent were changed from 80 vol% to 90 vol% acetonitrile in water.
However, for the polar solutes which were separated using the normal-phase chromatography on bare silica with methyl t=butyl ether and 2-propanol solvent, the retention time would be lower if the eluent were changed from 40 vol% to 60 vol% 2-propanol.