All categories

3 years ago

Ihjpr2 ywjegnak'evsinawhe2'qwmasnh ngl,;snhy

Engineering

2 answers:

WITCHER [35]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

ummm ok?

Explanation:

Scorpion4ik [409]3 years ago

6 0

░░░░░▐▀█▀▌░░░░▀█▄░░░

░░░░░▐█▄█▌░░░░░░▀█▄░░

░░░░░░▀▄▀░░░▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░

░░░░▄▄▄██▀▀▀▀░░░░░░░

░░░█▀▄▄▄█░▀▀░░ Bob the builder

░░░▌░▄▄▄▐▌▀▀▀░░ This is Bob

▄░▐░░░▄▄░█░▀▀ ░░

▀█▌░░░▄░▀█▀░▀ ░░ Copy And Paste Him onto all of ur brainly answers

░░░░░░░▄▄▐▌▄▄░░░ So, He Can Take

░░░░░░░▀███▀█░▄░░ Over brainly

░░░░░░▐▌▀▄▀▄▀▐▄░░

░░░░░░▐▀░░░░░░▐▌░░

░░░░░░█░░░░░░░░█

Read more about resistance here:

brainly.com/question/17563681

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

A fatigue test was conducted in which the mean stress was 46.2 MPa and the stress amplitude was 219 MPa.

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer:

a)σ₁ = 265.2 MPa

b)σ₂ = -172.8 MPa

c) $Stress\ ratio =-0.65$

d)Range = 438 MPa

Explanation:

Given that

Mean stress ,σm= 46.2 MPa

Stress amplitude ,σa= 219 MPa

Lets take

Maximum stress level = σ₁

Minimum stress level =σ₂

The mean stress given as

$\sigma_m=\dfrac{\sigma_1+\sigma_2}{2}$

$2\sigma_m={\sigma_1+\sigma_2}$

2 x 46.2 = σ₁ + σ₂

σ₁ + σ₂ = 92.4 MPa --------1

The amplitude stress given as

$\sigma_a=\dfrac{\sigma_1-\sigma_2}{2}$

$2\sigma_a={\sigma_1-\sigma_2}$

2 x 219 = σ₁ - σ₂

σ₁ - σ₂ = 438 MPa --------2

By adding the above equation

2 σ₁ = 530.4

σ₁ = 265.2 MPa

-σ₂ = 438 -265.2 MPa

σ₂ = -172.8 MPa

Stress ratio

$Stress\ ratio =\dfrac{\sigma_{min}}{\sigma_{max}}$

$Stress\ ratio =\dfrac{-172.8}{265.2}$

$Stress\ ratio =-0.65$

Range = 265.2 MPa - ( -172.8 MPa)

Range = 438 MPa

8 0

3 years ago

A well is located in a 20.1-m thick confined aquifer with a conductivity of 14.9 m/day and a storativity of 0.0051. If the well

ahrayia [7]

Answer:

S = 5.7209 M

Explanation:

Given data:

B = 20.1 m

conductivity ( K ) = 14.9 m/day

Storativity ( s ) = 0.0051

1 gpm = 5.451 m^3/day

calculate the Transmissibility ( T ) = K * B

= 14.9 * 20.1 = 299.5 m^2/day

Note :

t = 1

U = ( r^2* S ) / (4*T*<em> t </em>)

= ( 7^2 * 0.0051 ) / ( 4 * 299.5 * 1 ) = 2.0859 * 10^-4

Applying the thesis method

W(u) = -0.5772 - In(U)

= 7.9

next we calculate the pumping rate from well ( Q ) in m^3/day

= 500 * 5.451 m^3 /day

= 2725.5 m^3 /day

Finally calculate the drawdown at a distance of 7.0 m form the well after 1 day of pumping

S = $\frac{Q}{4\pi T} * W (u)$

where : Q = 2725.5

T = 299.5

W(u) = 7.9

substitute the given values into equation above

S = 5.7209 M

4 0

3 years ago

A two-dimensional flow field described by

Oduvanchick [21]

Answer:

the answer is

Explanation:

<h2> We now focus on purely two-dimensional flows, in which the velocity takes the form </h2><h2>u(x, y, t) = u(x, y, t)i + v(x, y, t)j. (2.1) </h2><h2>With the velocity given by (2.1), the vorticity takes the form </h2><h2>ω = ∇ × u = </h2><h2> </h2><h2>∂v </h2><h2>∂x − </h2><h2>∂u </h2><h2>∂y </h2><h2>k. (2.2) </h2><h2>We assume throughout that the flow is irrotational, i.e. that ∇ × u ≡ 0 and hence </h2><h2>∂v </h2><h2>∂x − </h2><h2>∂u </h2><h2>∂y = 0. (2.3) </h2><h2>We have already shown in Section 1 that this condition implies the existence of a velocity </h2><h2>potential φ such that u ≡ ∇φ, that is </h2><h2>u = </h2><h2>∂φ </h2><h2>∂x, v = </h2><h2>∂φ </h2><h2>∂y . (2.4) </h2><h2>We also recall the definition of φ as </h2><h2>φ(x, y, t) = φ0(t) + Z x </h2><h2>0 </h2><h2>u · dx = φ0(t) + Z x </h2><h2>0 </h2><h2>(u dx + v dy), (2.5) </h2><h2>where the scalar function φ0(t) is arbitrary, and the value of φ(x, y, t) is independent </h2><h2>of the integration path chosen to join the origin 0 to the point x = (x, y). This fact is </h2><h2>even easier to establish when we restrict our attention to two dimensions. If we consider </h2><h2>two alternative paths, whose union forms a simple closed contour C in the (x, y)-plane, </h2><h2>Green’s Theorem implies that </h2><h2> </h2><h2> </h2><h2> </h2><h2> </h2><h2> </h2><h2></h2><h2></h2>

5 0

3 years ago