1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Natasha_Volkova [10]
3 years ago
11

A silicon carbide plate fractured in bending when a blunt load was applied to the plate center. The distance between the fractur

e origin and the mirror/mist boundary on the fracture surface was 0.796 mm. To determine the stress used to break the plate, three samples of the same material were tested and produced the following. What is the estimate of the stress present at the time of fracture for the original plate?
Mirror Radius (mm) Bending Failure Stress (MPa)
.603 225
.203 368
.162 442
Engineering
1 answer:
Amanda [17]3 years ago
3 0

Question in order:

A silicon carbide plate fractures in bending when a blunt load was applied to the plate center. The distance between the fracture origin and the mirror/mist boundary on the fracture surface was 0.796 mm. To determine the stress used to break the plate, three samples of the same material were tested and produced the following. What is the estimate of the stress present at the time of fracture for the original plate?

Mirror Radius (mm) Bending Failure Stress (MPa)

0.603                         225

0.203                         368

0.162                         442

Answer:

191 MPa

Explanation:

Failure stress of bending is Inversely proportional to the mirror radius

Bending Stress = \frac{1}{(Mirror Radius)^{n}}

At mirror radius 1 = 0.603 mm   Bending stress 1 = 225 Mpa..............(1)

At mirror radius 2 = 0.203 mm  Bending stress 2 = 368 Mpa...............(2)

At mirror radius 3 = 0.162 mm   Bending stress 3 = 442 Mpa...............(3)

comparing case 1 and 2 using the above equation

\frac{Stress 1}{Stress 2} = ({\frac{Radius 2}{Radius 1}})^{n_1}

\frac{225}{368} = ({\frac{0.203}{0.603}})^{n_1}

0.6114 = (0.3366)^{n_1}

Taking the natural logarithm of both side

ln(0.6114) = n ln(0.3366)

n₁ = ln(0.6114)/ln(0.3366)

n₁ = 0.452

comparing case 2 and 3 using the above equation

\frac{Stress 2}{Stress 3} = ({\frac{Radius 3}{Radius 2}})^{n_2}

\frac{368}{442} = ({\frac{0.162}{0.203}})^{n_2}

0.8326 = (0.7980)^{n_2}

Taking the natural logarithm of both side

ln(0.8326) = n ln(0.7980)

n₂ = ln(0.8326)/ln(0.7980)

n₂ = 0.821

comparing case 1 and 3 using the above equation

\frac{Stress 1}{Stress 3} = ({\frac{Radius 3}{Radius 1}})^{n_3}

\frac{225}{442} = ({\frac{0.162}{0.603}})^{n_3}

0.5090 = (0.2687)^{n_3}

Taking the natural logarithm of both side

ln(0.5090) = n ln(0.2687)

n₃ = ln(0.5090)/ln(0.2687)

n₃ = 0.514

average for n

n = \frac{n_1 + n_2 + n_3}{3}

n = \frac{0.452 +0.821 + 0.514}{3}

n = 0.596

Hence to get bending stress x at mirror radius 0.796

\frac{Stress x}{Stress 3} = ({\frac{Radius 3}{Radius x}})^{0.596}

\frac{Stress x}{225} = ({\frac{0.603}{0.796}})^{0.596}

\frac{Stress x}{225} = 0.8475

stress x = 191 MPa

You might be interested in
If engineering is easy then why don't most people join?
Mazyrski [523]
Engineering requires a lot of school
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The boost converter of Fig. 6-8 has parameter Vs 20 V, D 0.6, R 12.5 , L 10 H, C 40 F, and the switching frequency is 200 kHz. (
mr Goodwill [35]

Answer:

a) the output voltage is 50 V

b)

- the average inductor current is 10 A

- the maximum inductor current is 13 A

- the maximum inductor current is 7 A

c) the output voltage ripple is 0.006 or 0.6%V₀

d) the average current in the diode under ideal components is 4 A

Explanation:

Given the data in the question;

a) the output voltage

V₀ = V_s/( 1 - D )

given that; V_s = 20 V, D = 0.6

we substitute

V₀ = 20 / ( 1 - 0.6 )

V₀ = 20 / 0.4

V₀ = 50 V

Therefore, the output voltage is 50 V

b)

- the average inductor current

I_L = V_s / ( 1 - D )²R

given that R = 12.5 Ω, V_s = 20 V, D = 0.6

we substitute

I_L = 20 / (( 1 - 0.6 )² × 12.5)

I_L = 20 / (( 0.4)² × 12.5)

I_L = 20 / ( 0.16 × 12.5 )

I_L = 20 / 2

I_L = 10 A

Therefore, the average inductor current is 10 A

- the maximum inductor current

I_{Lmax = [V_s / ( 1 - D )²R] + [ V

given that, R = 12.5 Ω, V_s = 20 V, D = 0.6, L = 10 μH, T = 1/200 kHz = 5 hz

we substitute

I_{Lmax = [20 / (( 1 - 0.6 )² × 12.5)] + [ (20 × 0.6 × 5) / (2 × 10) ]

I_{Lmax = [20 / 2 ] + [ 60 / 20 ]    

I_{Lmax = 10 + 3

I_{Lmax = 13 A

Therefore, the maximum inductor current is 13 A

- The minimum inductor current

I_{Lmax = [V_s / ( 1 - D )²R] - [ V

given that, R = 12.5 Ω, V_s = 20 V, D = 0.6, L = 10 μH, T = 1/200 kHz = 5 hz

we substitute

I_{Lmin = [20 / (( 1 - 0.6 )² × 12.5)] - [ (20 × 0.6 × 5) / (2 × 10) ]

I_{Lmin = [20 / 2 ] -[ 60 / 20 ]    

I_{Lmin = 10 - 3

I_{Lmin  = 7 A

Therefore, the maximum inductor current is 7 A

 

c)  the output voltage ripple

ΔV₀/V₀ = D/RCf

given that; R = 12.5 Ω, C = 40 μF = 40 × 10⁻⁶ F, D = 0.6, f = 200 Khz = 2 × 10⁵ Hz

we substitute

ΔV₀/V₀ = 0.6 / (12.5 × (40 × 10⁻⁶) × (2 × 10⁵) )

ΔV₀/V₀ = 0.6 / 100

ΔV₀/V₀ = 0.006 or 0.6%V₀

Therefore, the output voltage ripple is 0.006 or 0.6%V₀

d) the average current in the diode under ideal components;

under ideal components; diode current = output current

hence the diode current will be;

I_D = V₀/R

as V₀ = 50 V and R = 12.5 Ω

we substitute

I_D = 50 / 12.5

I_D = 4 A

Therefore, the average current in the diode under ideal components is 4 A

7 0
3 years ago
Why is oil black and why does oil look black
Rina8888 [55]

Answer:While heat cycles cause oil to darken, soot causes oil to turn black

Explanation:

Most people associate soot with diesel engines, but gasoline engines can produce soot as well, particularly modern gasoline-direct-injection engines. ... Any finer filtration and the filter could catch dissolved additives in the motor oil

4 0
2 years ago
An add tape of 101 ft is incorrectly recorded as 100 ft for a 200-ft distance. What is
baherus [9]

Answer:

the correct distance is 202 ft

Explanation:

The computation of the correct distance is shown below:

But before that correction to be applied should be determined

= (101 ft - 100 ft) ÷ (100 ft) × 200 ft

= 2 ft

Now the correct distance is

= 200 ft +  2 ft

= 202 ft

Hence, the correct distance is 202 ft

The same would be relevant and considered too

4 0
3 years ago
What is a problem that technology can help solve that problem?
Maslowich
Seeing what the other side of the world is doing right now
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • When a mesh in a circuit contains an independent or dependent current source, this leads to a special case of mesh-current analy
    14·1 answer
  • A evolução da malha rodoviária do Brasil é um marco notável
    9·1 answer
  • What the Best describes the purpose of the occupational safety and health administración OSHA
    12·1 answer
  • HELLO <br> Can you please Suggest me some FYP ideas <br> #Software_Engineering
    6·1 answer
  • The average human heart Beats 1.15 times 10 to the power of 5 per day. There are 3.65 times 10 to the power of 2 days in one yea
    14·1 answer
  • The ultimate BOD of a river just below a sewage outfall is 50.0 mg/L, and the oxygen deficit at the outfall D0 is 2.0 mg/L. The
    6·1 answer
  • What happens to the electrolyte, during discharging?
    9·1 answer
  • PDC Bank is working on creating an AI application that enables customers to send SMS to the AI application to allow banking acti
    9·1 answer
  • What two factors are changing when the current is changed on an electric generator
    7·1 answer
  • Explain wet and dry compression tests​
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!