Answer:
Likely due to confounding.
Explanation:
This outcome can most likely be explained as a consequence of confounding. Confounding refers to a distortion in the measure of association between two variables. This inaccuracy is the consequence of the variable of interest being mixed up with another factor that played a role in the result. In this example, this means that there might be another variable at play that causes this association between eating fruits and vegetables and the risk of developing colon cancer.
Answer:
ask in English then I can help u
<span>George Wilson and Tom Buchanan are similar in their mentalities about monetary gains and their socioeconomic positioning in the society of the 1920s. On the other hand, Myrtle and Daisy can be seen as diametric opposites, in that Daisy cares more for the valuable aspects of life as opposed to monetary.</span>
Answer: Both approach
Explanation:
This boils down to opinion of the masses as individuals choices differ, as most voters combine both retrospective and prospective approach when selecting their choice candidate. Some judge based on past performance of the candidate; was he successful to handling projects and Co? while others choose based what the candidate is promising to fulfill when they get into office.
Although some persons are more confident on past success of a candidate, some others would love to see changes that come with the new candidate.
