1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
navik [9.2K]
3 years ago
14

Four identical masses m are evenly spaced on a frictionless 1D track. The first mass is sent at speed v toward the other three.

As the masses collide they stick together. Mass 1 sticks to 2, then 1 2 sticks to 3, then 1 2 3 sticks to 4. When the combined 1 2 3 mass strikes mass 4, by what percentage does the speed decrease in %
Physics
1 answer:
SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The speed decreases 75%.

Explanation:

  • Since no friction present, assuming no external forces acting during the three collisions, total momentum must be conserved.
  • For the first collission, only mass 1 is moving before it, so we can write the following equation:

       p_{i} = p_{f} = m*v_{o}    (1)

  • Since both masses are identical, and they stick together after the collision, we can express the final momentum as follows:

       p_{f1} = 2*m*v_{1}    (2)

  • From (1) and (2) we get:
  • v₁ = v₀/2  (3)
  • Since the masses are moving on a frictionless 1D track, the speed of the set of mass 1 and 2 combined together before colliding with mass 3 is just v₁, so the initial momentum prior the second collision (p₁) can be expressed as follows:

       p_{1} = 2*m*v_{1} = 2*m*\frac{v_{o} }{2}  = m*v (4)

  • Since after the collision the three masses stick together, we can express this final momentum (p₂) as follows:

        p_{2} = 3*m*v_{2}  (5)

  • From (4) and (5) we get:
  • v₂ = v₀/3  (6)
  • Since the masses are moving on a frictionless 1D track, the speed of the set of mass 1, 2 and 3 combined together before colliding with mass 4 is just v₂, so the initial momentum prior the third collision (p₂) can be expressed as follows:

      p_{2} = 3*m*v_{2} = 3*m*\frac{v_{o} }{3}  = m*v (7)

  • Since after the collision the four masses stick together, we can express this final momentum (p₃) as follows:

       p_{3} = 4*m*v_{3}  (8)

  • From (7) and (8) we get:
  • v₃ = v₀/4
  • This means that after the last collision, the speed will have been reduced to a 25% of the initial value, so it will have been reduced in a 75% regarding the initial value of v₀.
You might be interested in
True or false? Magnetic reversals are recorded in the newly formed oceanic crust on BOTH sides of a mid-ocean ridge spreading ce
andrey2020 [161]

answer: false is my answer for thi question

4 0
3 years ago
Kids are pelting a window with snowballs. On average, two snowballs of roughly 300-g mass hit the window each second, moving hor
hram777 [196]

Answer:

The average force exerted on the window due to two snowballs is 6 N

Explanation:

Given:

Mass of snowballs m = 300 \times 10^{-3} Kg

Velocity of snowball v = 10 \frac{m}{s}

For finding the average force,

Force is equal to the change in momentum,

   F = \frac{dP}{dt}

Here, final velocity is zero so we write,

 F = \frac{mv}{1}

Where dt = 1 sec

 F = 300 \times 10^{-30} \times 10

F = 3 N

Above value of force is due to one ball, but here given in question there are two ball,

F = 3 \times 2

F = 6 N

Therefore, the average force exerted on the window due to two snowballs is 6 N

5 0
4 years ago
a) An electric circuit is rates, 240V, 13Ω calculate the amount of current that can be used by this appliance.​
zaharov [31]

Answer:

18.4615385 amps

Explanation:

The voltage V in volts (V) is equal to the current I in amps (A) times the resistance R in ohms (Ω):

5 0
3 years ago
How can a scientist ensure that his or her data are reliable?
laiz [17]
If the scientist repeats the experiment over and over and gets the same results. Also if the scientist peer reviews the experiment to make sure there is no bias in his or her results.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In mechanics, massless strings are often assumed. Why is that not a good assumption when discussing waves on strings?
Marizza181 [45]

In mechanics, massless strings are often assumed. but this is not a good assumption when discussing waves on strings because the speed of a wave on a massless string would be infinite.

<h3>How to explain the information?</h3>

It should be noted that waves simply means the dynamic disturbance of a quantity.

It should be noted that in mechanics, massless strings are often assumed. but this is not a good assumption when discussing waves on strings because the speed of a wave on a massless string would be infinite.

Learn more about waves in:

brainly.com/question/15663649

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • Which candidate won an election that was ultimately decided by the supreme court
    15·1 answer
  • Which sets of data show a wave with the shortest wavelength? A. Speed=100 million m/s and frequency = 50 million Hz. B. Speed=15
    12·1 answer
  • I need help with this physics question
    10·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP What is necessary condition for production of waves?
    9·2 answers
  • Suppose a rocket ship accelerates upwards with acceleration equal in magnitude to twice the magnitude of g (we say that the rock
    9·1 answer
  • When a 4kg mass is hung vertically on a light spring, the spring stretches 2.5cm. A.) How far will the spring stretch if an addi
    12·1 answer
  • Outside a spherically symmetric charge distribution of net charge Q, Gauss's law can be used to show that the electric field at
    5·1 answer
  • 6. A 2000 kg spacecraft is located 9.2x10 m from the center of the earth. The mass of the earth
    15·1 answer
  • One peice of evidence that the universe is expanding
    11·1 answer
  • Can y’all help me with 5 plsssss
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!