Answer:
ig good
mostly bored
u would rlly drive that instead a ferrari??
Explanation:
Answer:
Option b) False
Explanation:
The given statement for a prismatic bar having constant area of cross section
is not correct and hence False as the length of the bar is not infinite.
The length of the prismatic bar must be very large in comparison to the thickness and width of the bar but has finite length and is not infinite.
Therefore, the correct statement is:
"In plane stress, a prismatic bar with constant area of cross section has finite length."
Answer:
Explanation:
Given
scale i.e. 
Using Reynolds number similarity


Properties of air

Properties of sea water





Safety belt violation would be charged to the front seat passenger.
Answer: Option A.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Essential safety belt laws permit law implementation officials to ticket a driver or traveler for not wearing a safety belt, with no other traffic offense occurring. 11 states incorporate back seats as auxiliary implementation. Five of these are states with essential safety belt laws for front seat tenants.
In 15 of the 50 expresses, the safety belt law is viewed as an optional offense, which implies that a cop can't stop and ticket a driver for the sole offense of not wearing a safety belt. (One special case to this is Colorado, where kids not appropriately limited is an essential offense and brings an a lot bigger fine.)
Both technicians are correct
Explanation:
They are each correct for separate reasons. Tech A is correct due to pressure and temperature both being important factors and quantities to vaporize anything. Tech B is correct due to fuel particles being easier to burn due to their chemical structure.