2.57 joule energy lose in the bounce
.
<u>Explanation</u>:
when ball is the height of 1.37 m from the ground it has some gravitational potential energy with respect to hits the ground
Formula for gravitational potential energy given by
Potential Energy = mgh
Where
,
m = mass
g = acceleration due to gravity
h = height
Potential energy when ball hits the ground
m= 0.375 kg
h = 1.37 m
g = 9.8 m/s²
Potential Energy = 5.03 joule
Potential energy when ball bounces up again
h= 0.67 m
Potential Energy = 2.46 joule
Energy loss = 5.03 - 2.46 = 2.57 joule
2.57 joule energy lose in the bounce
Answer:
22m/s
Explanation:
To find the velocity we employ the equation of free fall: v²=u²+2gh
where u is initial velocity, g is acceleration due to gravity h is the height, v is the velocity the moment it hits the ground, taking the direction towards gravity as positive.
Substituting for the values in the question we get:
v²=2×9.8m/s²×25m
v²=490m²/s²
v=22.14m/s which can be approximated to 22m/s
Sorry I didn't see this before...
Okay, I see two major problems with this student's experiment:
1) Nitric acid Won't Dissolve in Methane
Nitric acid is what's called a mineral acid. That means it is inorganic (it doesn't contain carbon) and dissolves in water.
Methane is an organic molecule (it contains carbon). It literally cannot dissolve nitric acid. Here's why:
For nitric acid (HNO3) to dissolve into a solvent, that solvent must be polar. It must have a charge to pull the positively charged Hydrogen off of the Oxygen. Methane has no charge, since its carbon and hydrogens have nearly perfect covalent bonds. Thus it cannot dissolve nitric acid. There will be no solution. That leads to the next problem:
2) He's Not actually Measuring a Solution
He's picking up the pH of the pure nitric acid. Since it didn't dissolve, what's left isn't a solution—it's like mixing oil and water. He has groups of methane and groups of nitric acid. Since methane is perfectly neutral (neither acid nor base), the electronic instrument is only picking up the extremely acidic nitric acid. There's no point to what he's doing.
Does that help?
Ocean breezes are due to the convection method of heat transfer
The longer you spend reading and thinking about this question,
the more defective it appears.
-- In each case, the amount of work done is determined by the strength
of
the force AND by the distance the skateboard rolls <em><u>while you're still
</u></em>
<em><u>applying the force</u>. </em>Without some more or different information, the total
distance the skateboard rolls may or may not tell how much work was done
to it.<em>
</em>
-- We know that the forces are equal, but we don't know anything about
how far each one rolled <em>while the force continued</em>. All we know is that
one force must have been removed.
-- If one skateboard moves a few feet and comes to a stop, then you
must have stopped pushing it at some time before it stopped, otherwise
it would have kept going.
-- How far did that one roll while you were still pushing it ?
-- Did you also stop pushing the other skateboard at some point, or
did you stick with that one?
-- Did each skateboard both roll the same distance while you continued pushing it ?
I don't think we know enough about the experimental set-up and methods
to decide which skateboard had more work done to it.
