1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sphinxa [80]
3 years ago
8

Need ur help,,, :-[ :-{...... ............ .. .. ​

Physics
1 answer:
SOVA2 [1]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Graph B express the magnetic relationship of magnetic flux and electronic flow

You might be interested in
I NEED HELP WITH NUMBER 7 I WILL GIVE U BRAINLIEST
grigory [225]

Answer:

the blue one

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
As you can see, my cousin has a lot of hair. He uses an 1800 W blow dryer and it takes him
maw [93]

Power = 1800W (or 1.8KW by dividing by 1000)

Time = 3 hours

Power = energy/ time

1.8KW = energy/ 3

x3

5.4Kw/h= energy

(5.4KJ or 5400J used)

$0.15 Kw/h

$0.15 X 5.4 = 0.81

Thus, cost $0.81

Hope this helps!

5 0
2 years ago
If the two particles that make up the dipole are 2.5 mm apart, what is the magnitude of the charge on each particle
ad-work [718]

This question is incomplete, the complete question is;

The electric force due to a uniform external electric field causes a torque of magnitude 20.0 × 10⁻⁹ N⋅m on an electric dipole oriented at 30° from the direction of the external field. The dipole moment of the dipole is 7.5 × 10⁻¹² C⋅m.

What is the magnitude of the external electric field?

If the two particles that make up the dipole are 2.5 mm apart, what is the magnitude of the charge on each particle?

Answer:

- the magnitude of the external electric field is 5333.3 N/C

- the magnitude of the charge on each particle is 3.0 × 10⁻¹² C  ≈ 3 nC

Explanation:

Given that;

Torque = 20.0 × 10⁻⁹ N⋅m

dipole moment = 7.5 × 10⁻¹²

∅ = 30°

The moment T of restoring couple is;

T = PEsin∅

E = T/Psin∅

we substitute

E = 20.0 × 10⁻⁹ N⋅m / (7.5 × 10⁻¹²) sin(30°)

E = 20.0 × 10⁻⁹ / 3.75 × 10⁻¹²

E =  5333.3 N/C

Therefore, the magnitude of the external electric field is 5333.3 N/C

The dipole moment is given by the expression;

p = ql

q = p / l

given that l = 2.5 mm = 0.0025 m

we substitute

q = 7.5 × 10⁻¹² / 0.0025

q = 3.0 × 10⁻¹² C ≈ 3 nC

Therefore, the magnitude of the charge on each particle is 3.0 × 10⁻¹² C ≈ 3 nC

7 0
3 years ago
On a straight, level, two-lane road, two cars moving in opposite directions approach and pass each other. Car A is in the eastbo
ludmilkaskok [199]

Answer:

a) 42 m/s, positive direction (to the east), b) 42 m/s, negative direction (to the west).

Explanation:

a) Let consider that Car A is moving at positive direction. Then, the relative velocity of Car A as seen by the driver of Car B is:

\vec v_{A/B} = \vec v_{A} - \vec v_{B}\\\vec v_{A/B} = 11 \frac{m}{s} \cdot i + 31 \frac{m}{s} \cdot i\\\vec v_{A/B} = 42 \frac{m}{s} \cdot i

42 m/s, positive direction (to the east).

b) The relative velocity of Car B as seen by the drive of Car A is:

\vec v_{B/A} = \vec v_{B} - \vec v_{A}\\\vec v_{B/A} = -31 \frac{m}{s} \cdot i - 11 \frac{m}{s} \cdot i\\\vec v_{B/A} = - 42 \frac{m}{s} \cdot i

42 m/s, negative direction (to the west).

5 0
3 years ago
It is believed that increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere will result in
Jobisdone [24]

"Belief" is not involved.  

<em>Choice-A</em> is the correct answer. Except that it's not "... will result in ...".  It's already happening.

The people who have been keeping records of temperatures at a thousand places around the world, for the past hundred years, do not "believe".  They know that average global temperatures are increasing, and have been increasing steadily for a couple of Centuries now.

Working from hypotheses, models, observations, and proven laws of nature, the global scientific community are convinced that increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, driven by human activity, are the cause of the trend in average global temperatures.

Yes, you can find published researchers who aren't so sure, and who disagree with this conclusion.  The scientific community is <em>never</em> 100% unanimous.  There were reasonable investigators and scientific observers who disagreed with Galileo, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Hawking and Einstein, in their time.  

But the voices that dispute human-caused climate change in the form of global warming are few, and they're becoming fewer as time goes on. Today, their reputation sits just a few notches above that of the Flat-Earthers, and it's continuing to sag further.

If we are to do what has to be done, in time to bring about the needed effect, it can't sag fast enough.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Consider first the generation of the magnetic field by the current I1(t)I1(t)I_{1}(t) in solenoid
    14·1 answer
  • The neck is a _______.
    13·2 answers
  • Keplers laws follow which law discovered by sir Isaac Newton
    6·2 answers
  • A 238 92U nucleus is moving in the x-direction at 5.0 × 105 m/s when it decays into an alpha particle 4 2He and a 234 90Th. If t
    6·1 answer
  • Please help PHYSICS
    7·2 answers
  • Which term describes the increase in a material’s volume due to an increase in temperature?
    12·2 answers
  • A 64 kg cross-country skier glides over snow. Thecoefficient
    11·1 answer
  • Q2/Deceleration of a particle is based on relation a=-3 v² m/s² where v in m/s. If it moves along a straight line and has veloci
    10·1 answer
  • Marco is conducting an experiment. He knows the wave that he is working with has a wavelength of 32. 4 cm. If he measures the fr
    12·1 answer
  • 6) If I were to drop a ball out of my car while I was traveling at a velocity of 25 m/s, and it underwent a
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!