Yes. Source D is more believable because Source C is from a book that “Criticizes the building of the dam”. It is only a comment by a journalist and source D is information that was released by the Chinese government itself. Source D also gives a more detailed explanation about what will happen because of the project.
Answer:
Needs assessment
Explanation:
Needs assessment refers to a system way of observing and recognizing the needs of a community or organisation. This can be used in evaluating the main needs or prioritise the needs of a community.
The researcher was invited by the community to determine whether a community centre would be a benefit in term of solving and reducing delinquency, promoting community servies, developing networks. This is a typical case needs assessment. The research is evaluating if the community centre is really important in the growth of the community or not.
Needs assessment helps to make right choices of what the community would actually be needing.
Answer: Edward Thorndike law of effect.
Explanation:The law of effect suggested that responses closely followed by satisfaction will become firmly attached to the situation and, therefore, more likely to reoccur when the situation is repeated. Conversely, if the situation is followed by discomfort, the connections to the situation will become weaker, and the behavior of response is less likely to occur when the situation is repeated.
In the case of Todd, the act of reading to him brings so much satisfaction to him that he request for books to be continually read to him. Conversely, because of of discomfort washing his hair brings, hes connection to the situation is weak and thus goes into hiding anytime he sees his parent with shampoo because he assumes that they want to wash his hair.
None of these conclusions is valid.
- The first one implies that people either think that their employer should cover part of the health insurance costs (as said in the original sentence), or they think that the employer should pay 100%. This is not correct because there are other possible opinions people can have, like thinking that the employer shouldn't pay for anything, for example.
- The second conclusion is invalid for the same reason: it implies that people can only either think that the employer should pay a large part, or that the employer shouldn't pay anything. It is not considering other options.
- The third conclusion does not work either because it is referring to what people think about <em>the amount </em>of the costs themselves, whereas the original topic was <em>how</em> they are paid for.
Answer:
In May 1991, Nepal held its first parliamentary elections. In February 1996, the Maoist parties declared People's War against monarchy and the elected government. ... On May 28, 2008, the newly elected Constituent Assembly declared Nepal a Federal Democratic Republic, abolishing the 240 year-old monarchy.
