Ucsaaaaauxx627384772938282’cc ed un e uff ridicolizzarla +golfista
The correct statement is: a higher than a normal voltage drop could indicate high resistance. Technician B is correct.
<h3>Ohm's law</h3>
Ohm's law states that the current flowing through a metallic conductor is directly proportional to the voltage provided all physical conditions are constant. Mathematically, it is expressed as
V = IR
Where
V is the potential difference
I is the current
R is the resistance
<h3>Technician A</h3>
High resistance causes an increase in current flow
V = IR
Divide both side by I
R = V / I
Thus, technician A is wrong as high resistance suggest low current flow
<h3>Technician B</h3>
Higher than normal voltage drop could indicate high resistance
V = IR
Thus, technician B is correct as high voltage indicates high resistance
<h3>Conclusion </h3>
From the above illustration, we can see that technician B is correct
Learn more about Ohm's law:
brainly.com/question/796939
Answer:2058.992KJ
Explanation:
Given data
Mass of object
=521kg
initial velocity
=90m/s
Final velocity
=14m/s
kinetic energy of body is given by=


change in kinectic energy is given by substracting final kinetic energy from initial kinetic energy of body.
Change in kinetic energy=

Change in kinetic energy=

Change in kinetic energy=2058.992KJ
Answer:
No, the claim is not reasonable for 20 W electric power consumption.
It is reasonable for 40 W electric power consumption.
Explanation:
Power = (1/2)*mass flow rate*(square of velocity)
mass flow rate = 1 kg/s
velocity = 8 m/s
square of velocity = 64 m^2 / s^2
Power = (1/2)*(1)*(64)
Power = 32 W
For a fan that consumes 20 W power it is not possible to deliver more power than 20 W but this one is delivering 32 W hence it is a false claim.
For a fan that consumes 40 W it is indeed possible to deliver 32 W considering the efficiency. Hence this claim is reasonable.
Explanation:
because mechanical engineers fix air conditioners cars and other stuffs