Using geometric sequence concepts, it is found that:
a) The rule is: 
.
b) An exponential relationship exists between the two variables.
<h3>What is a geometric sequence?</h3>
A geometric sequence is a sequence in which the result of the division of consecutive terms is always the same, called common ratio q.
The nth term of a geometric sequence is given by:
In which 
is the first term.
A geometric sequence represents an exponential relationship between the variables.
In this problem, considering that the first-place finisher wins half of $1.500.000 in total prize money, and each finisher earns half of the one who finished above, the first term and the common ratio are given by:
.
Hence the nth term of the sequence is given by:
More can be learned about geometric sequence concepts at brainly.com/question/11847927
#SPJ1
Example of use of terms:
Statement: If it is far, we take a bus.
Inverse: If it is not far, we do not take a bus.
Converse: If we take a bus, it is far.
Contrapositive: If we do not take a bus, it is not far.
We also know that
1. The inverse of the inverse is the statement itself, and similarly for converse and contrapositive.
2. Only the contrapositive is logically equivalent to the original statement.
This means that the converse and inverse are logically different from the original statement.
Now back to the given statement.
To find the original statement, we find the contrapositive of the contrapositive.
We then find the converse from the original statement, as in the example above.
Original statement
(note that in English, if it is not worth X dollars, means if it is not worth AT LEAST X dollars")
contrapositive of
<span>
"If an item is not worth five dimes, then it is not worth two quarters.”
is the negation of the converse, which become
"If an item is worth two quarters, then it is worth (at least) five dimes."
The converse of the previous statement is therefore
"If an item is worth (at least) five dimes then it is worth two quarters"
In this particular case, we can also take advantage of the fact that the contrapositive is the negation of the converse. So all we have to do is the provide the negation of each component of the contrapositive to get the converse:
"If an item is worth (at least) five dimes, then it is worth two quarters".
as before.
Note that the converse does NOT logically mean the same as the original statement.
</span>
Answer:
Option 1 - Using the Subtraction Property of Equality, 2 is subtracted from both sides of the equation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given : Process
Step 1: 4x + 2 = 10
Step 2: 4x = 8
To find : Which justification describes the process?
Solution :
From step 1 to step 2, we subtract 2 both sides
Step 1: 4x + 2 = 10
Subtracting 2 both side,
⇒ 4x + 2-2 = 10-2
Step 2: 4x = 8
So, The best justification is 'Using the Subtraction Property of Equality, 2 is subtracted from both sides of the equation'.
Therefore, Option 1 is correct.
Answer:
29 is answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that the function s(t) represents the position of an object at time t moving along a line. Suppose s(2)=150 and s(5)=237.
To find average velocity of the object over the interval of time [1,3]
We know that derivative of s is velocity and antiderivative of velocity is position vector .
Since moving along a line equation of s is
use two point formula
gives the position at time t.
Average velocity in interval (1,3)
=![\frac{1}{3-1} (s(3)-s(1))\\=\frac{1}{2} [87+58-29-58]\\=29](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B3-1%7D%20%28s%283%29-s%281%29%29%5C%5C%3D%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5B87%2B58-29-58%5D%5C%5C%3D29)
