The molecular weight of the substance.
In the equation,
2Al(s) + 3Cl2(g) —> 2AlCl3(s),
the large number "3" in front of Cl2 indicates the the number of moles of Chlorine molecules needed to balance the equation.
Hope this will help you.
If you like my answer. Please mark it as brainliest And Be my follower if possible.
Answer:
a. 1.7 × 10⁻⁴ mol·L⁻¹; b. 5.5 × 10⁻⁹ mol·L⁻¹
c. 2.3 × 10⁻⁴ mol·L⁻¹; 5.5 × 10⁻⁸ mol·L⁻¹
Explanation:
a. Silver iodate
Let s = the molar solubility.
AgIO₃(s) ⇌ Ag⁺(aq) + IO₃⁻(aq); Ksp = 3.0 × 10⁻⁸
E/mol·L⁻¹: s s
![K_{sp} =\text{[Ag$^{+}$][IO$_{3}$$^{-}$]} = s\times s = s^{2} = 3.0\times 10^{-8}\\s = \sqrt{3.0\times 10^{-8}} \text{ mol/L} = 1.7 \times 10^{-4} \text{ mol/L}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%5Ctext%7B%5BAg%24%5E%7B%2B%7D%24%5D%5BIO%24_%7B3%7D%24%24%5E%7B-%7D%24%5D%7D%20%3D%20s%5Ctimes%20s%20%3D%20%20s%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%203.0%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-8%7D%5C%5Cs%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B3.0%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-8%7D%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D%20%3D%201.7%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-4%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D)
b. Barium sulfate
BaSO₄(s) ⇌ Ba²⁺(aq) + SO₄²⁻(aq); Ksp = 1.1 × 10⁻¹⁰
I/mol·L⁻¹: 0.02 0
C/mol·L⁻¹: +s +s
E/mol·L⁻¹: 0.02 + s s
![K_{sp} =\text{[Ba$^{2+}$][SO$_{4}$$^{2-}$]} = (0.02 + s) \times s \approx 0.02s = 1.1\times 10^{-10}\\s = \dfrac{1.1\times 10^{-10}}{0.02} \text{ mol/L} = 5.5 \times 10^{-9} \text{ mol/L}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%5Ctext%7B%5BBa%24%5E%7B2%2B%7D%24%5D%5BSO%24_%7B4%7D%24%24%5E%7B2-%7D%24%5D%7D%20%3D%20%280.02%20%2B%20s%29%20%5Ctimes%20s%20%5Capprox%20%200.02s%20%3D%201.1%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7D%5C%5Cs%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1.1%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7D%7D%7B0.02%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D%20%3D%205.5%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-9%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D)
c. Using ionic strength and activities
(i) Calculate the ionic strength of 0.02 mol·L⁻¹ Ba(NO₃)₂
The formula for ionic strength is
![\mu = \dfrac{1}{2} \sum_{i} {c_{i}z_{i}^{2}}\\\\\mu = \dfrac{1}{2} (\text{[Ba$^{2+}$]}\cdot (2+)^{2} + \text{[NO$_{3}$$^{-}$]}\times(-1)^{2}) = \dfrac{1}{2} (\text{0.02}\times 4 + \text{0.04}\times1)= \dfrac{1}{2} (0.08 + 0.04)\\\\= \dfrac{1}{2} \times0.12 = 0.06](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cmu%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Csum_%7Bi%7D%20%7Bc_%7Bi%7Dz_%7Bi%7D%5E%7B2%7D%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%5Cmu%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%28%5Ctext%7B%5BBa%24%5E%7B2%2B%7D%24%5D%7D%5Ccdot%20%282%2B%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%20%5Ctext%7B%5BNO%24_%7B3%7D%24%24%5E%7B-%7D%24%5D%7D%5Ctimes%28-1%29%5E%7B2%7D%29%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%28%5Ctext%7B0.02%7D%5Ctimes%204%20%2B%20%5Ctext%7B0.04%7D%5Ctimes1%29%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%280.08%20%2B%200.04%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20%5Ctimes0.12%20%3D%200.06)
(ii) Silver iodate
a. Calculate the activity coefficients of the ions

b. Calculate the solubility
AgIO₃(s) ⇌ Ag⁺(aq) + IO₃⁻(aq)
![K_{sp} =\text{[Ag$^{+}$]$\gamma_{Ag^{+}}$[IO$_{3}$$^{-}$]$\gamma_{IO_{3}^{-}}$} = s\times0.75\times s \times 0.75 =0.56s^{2}= 3.0 \times 10^{-8}\\s^{2} = \dfrac{3.0 \times 10^{-8}}{0.56} = 5.3 \times 10^{-8}\\\\s =2.3 \times 10^{-4}\text{ mol/L}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%5Ctext%7B%5BAg%24%5E%7B%2B%7D%24%5D%24%5Cgamma_%7BAg%5E%7B%2B%7D%7D%24%5BIO%24_%7B3%7D%24%24%5E%7B-%7D%24%5D%24%5Cgamma_%7BIO_%7B3%7D%5E%7B-%7D%7D%24%7D%20%3D%20s%5Ctimes0.75%5Ctimes%20s%20%5Ctimes%200.75%20%3D0.56s%5E%7B2%7D%3D%203.0%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-8%7D%5C%5Cs%5E%7B2%7D%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B3.0%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-8%7D%7D%7B0.56%7D%20%3D%205.3%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-8%7D%5C%5C%5C%5Cs%20%3D2.3%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-4%7D%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D)
(iii) Barium sulfate
a. Calculate the activity coefficients of the ions

b. Calculate the solubility
BaSO₄(s) ⇌ Ba²⁺(aq) + SO₄²⁻(aq
![K_{sp} =\text{[Ba$^{2+}$]$\gamma_{ Ba^{2+}}$[SO$_{4}$$^{2-}$]$\gamma_{ SO_{4}^{2-}}$} = (0.02 + s) \times 0.32\times s\times 0.32 \approx 0.02\times0.10s\\2.0\times 10^{-3}s = 1.1 \times 10^{-10}\\s = \dfrac{1.1\times 10^{-10}}{2.0 \times 10^{-3}} \text{ mol/L} = 5.5 \times 10^{-8} \text{ mol/L}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K_%7Bsp%7D%20%3D%5Ctext%7B%5BBa%24%5E%7B2%2B%7D%24%5D%24%5Cgamma_%7B%20Ba%5E%7B2%2B%7D%7D%24%5BSO%24_%7B4%7D%24%24%5E%7B2-%7D%24%5D%24%5Cgamma_%7B%20SO_%7B4%7D%5E%7B2-%7D%7D%24%7D%20%3D%20%280.02%20%2B%20s%29%20%5Ctimes%200.32%5Ctimes%20s%5Ctimes%200.32%20%5Capprox%20%200.02%5Ctimes0.10s%5C%5C2.0%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7Ds%20%3D%201.1%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7D%5C%5Cs%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7B1.1%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-10%7D%7D%7B2.0%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-3%7D%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D%20%3D%205.5%20%5Ctimes%2010%5E%7B-8%7D%20%5Ctext%7B%20mol%2FL%7D)
Answer:
Explanation has been given below
Explanation:
- In diaxial conformation of cis-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexane, 4 gauche-butane interactions along with syn-diaxial interaction are present. Hence it readily gets converted to diequitorial conformation where no such gauche-butane interaction is present
- In two possible conformations of trans-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexane, 2 gauche-butane interactions are present in each of them.
- Hence cis-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexane exists almost exclusively in diequitorial form. But trans-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexane has no such option.
- Trans-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexane experiences gauche butane interaction in each of the two conformations.
- Therefore cis-1,3-disubstituted cyclohexane is more stable than trans conformation